Hybrid Network Gateway Protocol Conversion
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The integration of Power Line Communication (PLC) and Radio Frequency (RF) technologies in hybrid networks is hindered by significant differences in their physical and link layers, making it difficult to establish efficient communication across transformers and in challenging environments like underground and tunnel settings.
Innovation Solution
A gateway device manages communication by receiving association requests from multimode devices supporting both PLC and RF protocols, obtaining IPv6 addresses, and recording correspondences between MAC addresses and physical interfaces, allowing packets to be routed appropriately across different interfaces without requiring the application layer to sense and select networks.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If PLC technology is used for hybrid networking, then high bandwidth and wall-penetration capability are achieved, but communication across transformers is not supported
Solution Approach 1:
The gateway device serves as an intermediary between PLC and RF networks, performing protocol conversion and packet routing. It receives packets from one network type, converts the protocol format, and forwards to the appropriate network, enabling communication across the transformer barrier that PLC alone cannot overcome
2Adaptability or versatility
If RF mesh network is constructed to enlarge coverage area, then device deployment flexibility is improved, but wireless signal strength deteriorates in underground and tunnel environments
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges PLC and RF network technologies into a hybrid architecture where PLC handles backbone communication through transformers and underground infrastructure, while RF provides wireless access in suitable areas. The gateway devices coordinate both networks to provide comprehensive coverage and reliable communication
3Adaptability or versatility
If PLC and RF technologies are integrated in hybrid networking, then advantages of each technology are highlighted, but implementation difficulty increases due to differences in physical and link layers
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the hybrid network into distinct functional layers: PLC network segment, RF network segment, and gateway conversion segment. Each segment operates independently with its own protocol stack, while gateways handle the protocol conversion between segments, simplifying overall implementation
Solution Approach 2:
Gateway devices act as mediators between PLC and RF networks, performing protocol conversion at the physical and link layers. The gateways receive packets from one network type, convert the protocol format, and forward to the appropriate network, abstracting away the complexity of direct PLC-RF integration
4Adaptability or versatility
If application layer senses and selects network, then network selection adaptability is achieved, but communication efficiency decreases due to sensing overhead
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of having the application layer sense and select networks (bottom-up approach), the patent implements a top-down approach where the network infrastructure (gateways and routing layer) automatically routes packets based on destination and network status. This eliminates sensing overhead while maintaining adaptability
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
A hybrid network communication method is disclosed. A gateway device receives a first association request of a multimode device through a first physical interface, where the first association request includes a MAC address of a second physical interface of the multimode device. The gateway device receives a second association request of the multimode device through a third physical interface, where the second association request includes a MAC address of a fourth physical interface of the multimode device. The gateway device obtains an IPv6 address of the multimode device, and records a first correspondence and a second correspondence. The first correspondence includes the IPv6 address of the multimode device, the MAC address of the second physical interface, and the first physical interface. The second correspondence includes the IPv6 address of the multimode device, the MAC address of the fourth physical interface, and the third physical interface. In this way, any physical interface may be selected based on the IPv6 address of the multimode device to access the multimode device without sensing a link-layer forwarding path. This improves flexibility and communication quality of a hybrid network.