Hybrid Polymer-Metal Plug for Chondral Defect Repair

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current synthetic implants for treating chondral defects in osteochondritis dissecans face issues with poor bone anchorage, excessive wear, and damage to opposing cartilage surfaces, lacking effective biologic fixation and wear resistance.

Innovation Solution

A novel implant with a porous surface for biologic fixation through bony ongrowth and/or ingrowth, combined with a polymer articulating surface that matches the compressive resistance of cartilage, providing stable anchoring and minimizing wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If synthetic implants (metal or rigid polymer) are used to treat chondral defects, then wear resistance is improved, but bone anchorage deteriorates and opposing cartilage surface is damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidbone anchorage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The implant combines a porous metal base (for bone anchorage) with a polymer articulating surface (for wear resistance and cartilage preservation). This composite structure allows each material to contribute its advantageous properties: the metal provides mechanical strength and bone integration, while the polymer provides compliance matching natural cartilage and reduced wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the implant have different material properties optimized for their specific functions. The base portion is made of porous metal for bone ongrowth and ingrowth, while the articulating surface is made of compliant polymer for minimizing wear and matching tissue compliance. This spatial differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between anchorage and wear resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If rigid polymer or metal articulating surfaces are used, then wear resistance is improved, but compliance matching human tissue deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidcompliance matching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The articulating surface is specifically designed with polymer material that has compressive resistance matching natural cartilage, creating local compliance where needed for tissue compatibility, while the base remains rigid for structural support and bone anchorage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If porous surface is added for biologic fixation, then bone anchorage is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone anchorageVSAvoidimplant structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The porous metal base serves dual purposes: it provides structural support and enables bone ongrowth/ingrowth through its porous structure. This integration of anchorage functionality into the base structure avoids adding separate complex anchorage mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The implant achieves optimal bone anchorage, wear resistance, and preservation of the opposing cartilage surface, addressing the limitations of existing synthetic implants by promoting bone integration and matching tissue compliance.

Implementation Method 1

The implant has a porous surface for biologic fixation through bony ongrowth and/or ingrowth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBone ongrowth and ingrowth:

Implementation Method 2

The implant also includes an articulating surface providing better wear properties against opposing cartilage than metal or rigid polymer articulating surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWear resistance: Wear

Implementation Method 3

The implant can be implanted using known techniques and existing instrumentation... closely matches the compliance of human tissue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressive resistance matching:

Data Source

PatentUS9095641B2Hybrid polymer/metal plug for treating chondral defects
Publication Date: 2015.08.04 ARTHREX INC
  • US9095641B2 patent drawing
  • US9095641B2 patent drawing
  • US9095641B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Osteochondral implants for repair of chondral defects and providing bone fixation through bone ongrowth and/or ingrowth. The implant is provided with a base allowing for bone ongrowth and/or ingrowth and a top attached to the base, the top being formed of a material having a compressive resistance similar to that of the cartilage. The material of the top is polycarbonate urethane, for example. The base may comprise a porous substrate for bony ingrowth formed of metal or PEEK and having a pattern porosity about similar to the porosity of cancellous bone. One side of the top attaches to the base for stability, and the other side of the top forms a surface for articulating with the opposing cartilage surface of the joint.