Hybrid Vehicle Power Flow Control With Convex Mission Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optimization methods for controlling vehicle power flows are computationally intensive and time-consuming, making real-time implementation challenging due to the complexity of nonlinear and non-convex cost functions and constraints.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a control unit to solve a convex optimal control problem by minimizing fuel consumption and battery charge constraints, using a discrete and continuous variable control approach, and applying Pontryagin's minimum principle to reduce computational effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If known optimization methods are used to minimize fuel consumption, then optimal control inputs are achieved, but computational time increases heavily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimality of controlVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control problem into two parts: an online control law that provides immediate control actions, and an offline optimization that computes optimal trajectories. This segmentation allows real-time control without heavy computational burden during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computation of optimal control trajectories offline before actual vehicle operation. The precomputed optimal paths and control inputs are stored and reused during real-time operation, eliminating the need for heavy real-time optimization calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If nonlinear and non-convex cost functions are used to model fuel consumption, then accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of fuel consumption modelingVSAvoidcomplexity of optimization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the nonlinear non-convex optimization problem into a convex optimization problem by changing parameters and variables. This transformation maintains accuracy in fuel consumption modeling while enabling efficient solution through convex optimization techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex nonlinear optimization mechanism with a convex optimization mechanism that has equivalent or superior performance. The convex formulation substitutes the difficult-to-solve nonlinear problem with a computationally tractable alternative that guarantees global optimality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3756963B1A method and a system for controlling a vehicle on a mission
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 FPT MOTORENFORSCHUNG AG
  • EP3756963B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3756963B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3756963B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a vehicle (101) on a mission, the vehicle (101) comprising a first and a second power source (ICE, EM) for driving the vehicle (101) itself, the method comprising the steps of: solving an optimal control problem based on a mathematical model of the vehicle (101), the optimal control problem involving at least one state variable (Eb); the solving including minimizing a cost function, with respect to first and second control variable (i, P) and subject to a set of constraints, based on Pontryagin's minimum principle and based on minimization of a Hamiltonian function (H), associated to the optimal control problem, with respect to the first control variable (i), the second control variable (P), and a costate variable (λ); and controlling the vehicle (101) based on the solution of the optimal control problem.