Hybrid Power Source Control for Real-Time Load Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power management systems for hybrid power sources, such as fuel cell and battery systems, face challenges in determining optimal energy source distribution for real-time load requirements, especially considering efficiency losses and environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for optimizing power management in hybrid systems, which involves generating a plant model based on a machine recipe, creating algorithms in an algorithm library for various scenarios using selected key performance indicators (KPIs), and integrating a refined algorithm into machine operation to optimize power distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a complex power management system with multiple energy sources (fuel cell, battery, ICE) is used to optimize fuel economy, then energy source distribution can be optimized, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economy optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power management system is segmented into multiple independent energy sources (fuel cell, battery, internal combustion engine), each with its own control algorithm. This allows the complex optimization problem to be divided into manageable subsystems that can be controlled independently while working together to achieve overall fuel economy optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operating parameters (power distribution ratios, engine load points, battery charge/discharge rates) based on real-time conditions to optimize fuel economy. By continuously adjusting these parameters across different energy sources, the system achieves optimal performance without requiring a completely complex integrated control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If real-time power distribution optimization is implemented considering efficiency losses and environmental conditions, then energy distribution accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy distribution accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes efficiency maps and operating characteristics for each energy source before real-time operation. These pre-calculated data structures allow the control algorithm to quickly determine optimal power distribution without performing complex real-time calculations, thus achieving high measurement precision with reduced computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simplified mathematical models and lookup tables that replicate the complex physical behavior of each energy source. These copied representations allow accurate prediction of efficiency losses and optimal power distribution without requiring computationally intensive real-time simulations of the actual physical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple controllers with different computational capabilities are used to manage hybrid power sources, then system adaptability improves, but integration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller adaptabilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm is designed to be universal and can be implemented on controllers with varying computational capabilities. The same basic algorithm structure works across different hardware platforms, allowing the system to adapt to available resources without requiring complex integration schemes for different controller types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a tiered control strategy where essential power distribution functions are performed on all controllers, while advanced optimization features are only activated on controllers with sufficient computational resources. This partial implementation approach allows adaptability across different hardware capabilities while avoiding the complexity of fully integrating all features on all platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250190649A1Power management optimization for hybrid power sources
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US20250190649A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190649A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190649A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for optimizing power management for a hybrid system of a machine are provided. The method includes generating a plant model based on a machine recipe of the machine; generating, in an algorithm library, algorithms for a plurality of scenarios simulated based on selected key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with the machine recipe, optimization connections, and machine requirements of the machine; selecting an algorithm from the algorithm library based on computational capabilities of a controller associated with the machine and machine requirements for the algorithm; simplifying the algorithm based on removing one or more KPIs of the selected KPIs; refining the algorithm based on weighing one or more remaining KPIs of the selected KPIs; and integrating the algorithm into machine operation to be performed by a control module of the machine.