Hybrid Processor Architecture for Space Radiation Hardening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mission application systems using commercially off-the-shelf components fail in hostile environments due to radiation exposure, and radiation-hardened processors are expensive and underperforming, particularly in space missions where processing speed is critical.

Innovation Solution

An environmentally hardened architecture is implemented, featuring a hybrid processor with both environmentally hardened and sensitive sections, a high-speed bus with corresponding interfaces, and an event detector that switches operations to the hardened sections during environmental events, ensuring critical applications are processed without sacrificing performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radiation hardened processors are used, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the processor into two distinct sections: a radiation-hardened processing section and an environmentally-sensitive processing section. The hardened section handles critical applications requiring reliability, while the sensitive section handles non-critical applications requiring high performance. This segmentation allows each section to be optimized for its specific purpose without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the processing system have different quality characteristics. The critical application processing section uses radiation-hardened components with high reliability but lower performance, while the non-critical application processing section uses high-performance COTS components that are sensitive to radiation. Each local section has the quality appropriate for its function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If radiation hardened processors are used, then object-affected harmful factors are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation susceptibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the processing workload and hardware into hardened and sensitive portions, managing complexity through clear separation of concerns. The event detector, hardened processor section, and bus switching mechanism work together to automatically manage which section handles which applications, reducing the operational complexity despite the increased hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An event detector serves as an intermediary that monitors environmental conditions and triggers switching between hardened and sensitive processing sections. The bus switching mechanism acts as an intermediary to route data traffic appropriately. These intermediaries simplify the control logic by automating the decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If COTS components are used, then device complexity is reduced, but object-affected harmful factors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidradiation susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by protecting only the specific sections that require radiation hardness rather than hardening the entire system. Critical application processing occurs in the hardened section, while non-critical processing uses vulnerable but simpler COTS components in the sensitive section, optimizing the balance between protection and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying radiation hardening to the entire processing system (excessive action), the invention applies hardening only to the extent necessary for critical applications (partial action). This partial hardening approach reduces the overall complexity and cost while still providing adequate protection for mission-critical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7761721B2System of integrated environmentally hardened architecture for space application
Publication Date: 2010.07.20 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US7761721B2 patent drawing
  • US7761721B2 patent drawing
  • US7761721B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An environmentally hardened architecture comprises a hybrid processor, a high speed bus having environmentally-sensitive interfaces, an environmentally hardened bus having environmentally-hardened interfaces, and an environmentally-hardened processor communicatively coupled to an environmentally-sensitive interface of the high speed bus and communicatively coupled to an environmentally-hardened interface of the environmentally hardened bus. The hybrid processor includes an environmentally-hardened processing section and an environmentally-sensitive processing section. At least one environmentally-sensitive interface is configured to pass data to and from the environmentally-sensitive processing section and another environmentally-sensitive interface is configured to pass data to and from the environmentally-hardened processing section of the hybrid processor. An environmentally-hardened interface is configured to pass data to and from the environmentally-hardened processing section of the hybrid processor. The environmentally-hardened processor processes critical applications in the environmentally-hardened processing section of the at least one hybrid processor during an environmental event.