Hybrid Manufacturing of Personalized PSIDs for Fast Precise Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Patient Setup and Immobilization Devices (PSIDs) in radiotherapy are inadequate in providing personalized, comfortable, and precise immobilization, leading to significant position uncertainties and increased stress for patients, as they cannot efficiently maintain alignment during treatment sessions.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid manufacturing system combining additive and subtractive processes to rapidly fabricate large-scale, personalized PSIDs, utilizing a pixel column model for digital construct approximation and toolpath generation, enabling rapid production of customized immobilization devices that can handle materials of varying densities and sizes, including whole-body applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional manufacturing methods are used to produce personalized PSIDs, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but production time is excessively long (days to weeks)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The PSID manufacturing process is divided into multiple build zones that can be processed independently and simultaneously. The build chamber is segmented into multiple zones, each with its own deposition system, allowing parallel fabrication of different portions of the personalized device, thereby reducing overall production time while maintaining precision through zone-specific control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts deposition parameters (flow rate, temperature, layer thickness) based on the specific material properties and desired precision requirements for each build zone. This allows the system to optimize between speed and precision for different portions of the PSID, achieving high productivity without sacrificing manufacturing accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional 3D printing is used for PSID fabrication, then customization is possible, but material deposition rate is too slow (thousands of times slower than required)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidmaterial deposition rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple material deposition systems are merged into a single integrated build chamber, allowing simultaneous deposition of multiple materials with different densities (transparent to radiation, variable water density) in different build zones. This combines the customization capability of traditional 3D printing with massively parallel material deposition, achieving both personalization and high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from sequential layer-by-layer deposition in a single zone to parallel multi-zone deposition across multiple spatial dimensions. By utilizing the third dimension (vertical stacking of build zones) and horizontal parallelism, the system achieves material deposition rates thousands of times faster than traditional 3D printing while maintaining full customization capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If simple immobilization technologies are used (thermal masks, head rings), then device complexity is low, but patient comfort deteriorates and position uncertainty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetechnology simplicityVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The PSID incorporates locally optimized properties in different build zones, with materials and structural features tailored to specific anatomical regions. This allows the device to provide appropriate support and comfort to each body part while maintaining overall structural integrity, significantly improving patient comfort compared to simple uniform immobilization devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Volume of moving object

If conventional manufacturing is used for large-scale PSIDs, then material handling is manageable, but production time increases to days or weeks

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePSID sizeVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Large-scale PSIDs are divided into multiple build zones that can be fabricated simultaneously in parallel. Each zone is processed independently but contributes to the overall large-scale structure, enabling rapid production of whole-body or large-body immobilization devices without the time penalty of sequential manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes multi-zone parallel architecture to scale up production capacity for large-volume PSIDs. By adding spatial dimensions (multiple stacked build zones) rather than simply increasing the size of a single build chamber, the system achieves rapid fabrication of large-scale personalized devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11383437B2Hybrid manufacturing apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 HU DONGMING
  • US11383437B2 patent drawing
  • US11383437B2 patent drawing
  • US11383437B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hybrid manufacturing apparatus utilizing both additive and subtractive manufacturing processes has a cutting mechanism, a magazine, and a deposition nozzle. A cutting mechanism engages and modifies material fed from a magazine, the finished material of this process to be positioned by a deposition nozzle. More specifically, the cutting mechanism provides a chamber supporting an inlet, an outlet, and at least one cutting head. The inlet receives fresh material, the cutting head is positioned within the chamber to create the desired contours in or on the material, and the material then exits the chamber via the outlet to be deposited according to instructions extracted from a digital model in a form of numerical control (NC) programming language. This model is natively subdivided into individual constructs each defining a set of values to guide creation of corresponding physical sections, and the placement thereof.