Hybrid Quantum-Classical DFT Exchange-Correlation Functional

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for simulating materials and chemical systems using Density Functional Theory (DFT) face limitations due to the accuracy of the exchange-correlation functional, particularly in strongly correlated systems, and are constrained by the computational capabilities of classical computers and noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid quantum-classical algorithm, Quantum Enhanced DFT (QEDFT), which uses noisy intermediate-scale quantum processors to approximate the exchange-correlation functional and then feeds this into a classical DFT iteration, allowing for improved ground-state calculations and overcoming the limitations of classical approximations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If classical DFT is used to simulate materials systems, then computational efficiency is improved, but accuracy in strongly correlated systems deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges classical DFT computational framework with quantum computational methods to create a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm. The quantum processor specifically computes the exchange-correlation functional while the classical processor handles the overall DFT iteration, combining the efficiency of classical methods with the accuracy of quantum methods for strongly correlated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a quantum processor as an intermediary component between the classical computational system and the exchange-correlation functional calculation. This quantum intermediary provides accurate computation of strongly correlated electron interactions that classical methods cannot handle accurately, while maintaining integration with the classical DFT workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If quantum computation is used to simulate materials systems, then accuracy is improved, but device complexity and noise sensitivity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidquantum processor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational task by dividing the simulation into two parts: the exchange-correlation functional calculation is performed on the quantum processor where it provides accuracy advantages, while the remaining DFT iterations are performed on the classical processor. This segmentation allows quantum computation to be used only where necessary, reducing overall device complexity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial quantum computation by using the quantum processor only for the specific subtask of computing the exchange-correlation functional, rather than performing the entire simulation quantum mechanically. This partial application of quantum computation achieves accuracy improvements while minimizing the complexity and noise exposure of the quantum system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If full quantum many-body simulation is performed, then exact results are obtained, but computational cost scales exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the specific computational challenge of calculating the exchange-correlation functional and assigns it to the quantum processor, while leaving the rest of the DFT computation to classical processors. This extraction allows the system to obtain exact quantum mechanical treatment where needed without bearing the full exponential computational cost of a complete quantum simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP4478263A1VQE for improved DFT simulations
Publication Date: 2024.12.18 PHASECRAFT LTD
  • EP4478263A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4478263A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4478263A1 patent drawingFigure 1B

AI summary

A method of performing improved Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory, DFT, calculations, for simulation of a material, chemical, or biological system includes: (i) constructing a model Hamiltonian of the system to be simulated; (ii) inputting an electron density of the system to be simulated; (iii) constructing a Kohn-Sham potential and (iv) executing a quantum Kohn-Sham DFT algorithm iteration using the electron density from (ii) and the Kohn-Sham potential from (iii) to compute an updated electron density and an updated total energy of the system to be simulated. The Kohn-Sham potential is constructed by: (1) providing a second Hamiltonian based on the model Hamiltonian; (2) calculating a ground state energy of the second Hamiltonian, as a function of electron density, using a quantum algorithm executed by a noisy intermediate-scale quantum, NISQ, processor; (3) computing a quantum-obtained exchange correlation energy functional, as a function of electron density, from the NISQ processor-obtained ground state energy of step (2); (4) obtaining a quantum-obtained exchange correlation potential functional by differentiation of the quantum-obtained exchange correlation energy functional from step (3); and (5) using the quantum-obtained exchange correlation potential functional from (4) to construct the Kohn-Sham potential.