Hybrid Quantum Classical Cryptography System for Secure Data Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cryptographic systems are vulnerable to quantum computers, which can rapidly solve integer factorization and discrete logarithmic problems, threatening the security of asymmetric algorithms used in classical cryptography.

Innovation Solution

A method that combines classical and quantum computer capabilities, where encryption is performed on a classical computer but decryption is handled by a quantum computer, and signature generation is done on a quantum computer with verification on a classical computer, using simulated quantum operations to determine processing times and select appropriate computers for each function.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If classical computers are used for both encryption and decryption, then the system is simpler to implement, but security is compromised against quantum computer attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cryptographic system is segmented into two distinct parts: a classical computer component for key generation and a quantum computer component for decryption. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, with the classical computer handling tasks it excels at and the quantum computer handling tasks that require quantum computational power, thereby achieving security without requiring the entire system to be quantum-based

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A hybrid classical-quantum system acts as an intermediary between traditional cryptographic systems and future quantum threats. The classical computer generates keys using established algorithms, while the quantum computer performs decryption when needed, creating a bridge that maintains security posture against both current and future computational capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If quantum computers are used for decryption, then security against quantum attacks is improved, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddecryption time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary key generation on classical computers using well-optimized algorithms before quantum decryption is needed. This preliminary action prepares the cryptographic materials in advance, so when quantum decryption is required, the process can proceed efficiently without the overhead of key generation during the decryption operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects between classical and quantum computational resources based on the specific cryptographic task at hand. Routine operations use classical computers for speed, while decryption operations that benefit from quantum capabilities are routed to quantum computers, creating a flexible, adaptive system that optimizes performance for each operation type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If full quantum computing capabilities are deployed, then decryption speed is improved, but hardware requirements and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecryption speedVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs partial quantum computing capabilities rather than requiring a full-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer. By using quantum computers only for specific decryption operations where quantum advantage is most pronounced, the system achieves significant decryption speed improvements without the need for complete quantum computational infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The hybrid system is designed to be multi-functional, capable of handling both classical cryptographic operations and quantum-accelerated decryption. This universality allows the system to leverage existing classical infrastructure while adding quantum capabilities only where needed, reducing overall hardware requirements compared to a dedicated quantum cryptographic system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12177197B1Quantum and classical cryptography (QCC) for data encryption and data decryption
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US12177197B1 patent drawing
  • US12177197B1 patent drawing
  • US12177197B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for establishing secure communications based on combined capabilities of classical and quantum computers. A system can perform encrypting, responsive to a request for client data associated with a client device, the client data using a cryptographic key to generate an encrypted data packet, transmitting the encrypted data packet to a second classical computer simulating a quantum computer operation, the encrypted data packet causing the second classical computer to begin a decryption process on the encrypted data packet to recover a decrypted data packet determining an absence of a response from the second classical computer occurring within a predefined window of time, the response comprising the decrypted data packet and transmitting, responsive to the absence of the response, the encrypted data packet to a quantum computer, the encrypted data packet causing the quantum computer to decrypt the encrypted data packet to recover a decrypted data packet.