Hybrid Retail Fulfillment Layout for Robotic Order Picking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Brick-and-mortar retailers face challenges in competing with online retailers due to inefficiencies in order fulfillment and increased costs, particularly in managing both self-service and online shopping models, especially when handling perishable items like food, which affects customer experience and profitability.

Innovation Solution

An automated-service retail system that integrates a mock marketplace, shopping terminals, picking stations, and an automated fulfillment system using mobile robots to streamline order fulfillment, allowing customers to select both fungible and non-fungible goods, with options for automated or manual picking, and efficient delivery solutions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If brick-and-mortar retailers implement traditional self-service models, then customers can shop in person, but the retailers incur high operational costs and inefficiencies in order fulfillment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment efficiencyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables customers to place orders online and complete checkout autonomously through automated checkout systems, eliminating the need for cashiers and reducing operational complexity while maintaining high fulfillment efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional manual picking and fulfillment processes are replaced with automated robotic systems that can pick, pack, and prepare orders automatically, significantly improving productivity while reducing the complexity of manual labor management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If brick-and-mortar retailers pick online orders in-store, then orders can be fulfilled, but the process is inefficient and disruptive to self-service customers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment speedVSAvoidcustomer shopping experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retail space is segmented into distinct zones: a customer-facing self-service area and a separate automated fulfillment area with robotic systems. This segmentation allows online order picking to occur without disrupting the self-service shopping experience, as robots operate independently in their dedicated zone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Automated robotic systems act as intermediaries between the online ordering system and the physical inventory. These robots handle all picking and fulfillment operations without human workers needing to enter customer zones, thereby maintaining ease of operation for customers while achieving high fulfillment speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If brick-and-mortar retailers expand into e-commerce, then online sales opportunities increase, but variable and fixed costs increase without increasing sales

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-channel capabilityVSAvoidcost structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated fulfillment system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it fulfills online orders, manages inventory across channels, and supports both brick-and-mortar and e-commerce operations. This multi-functionality enables the retailer to operate across multiple channels without proportionally increasing costs, as the same automated infrastructure serves diverse fulfillment needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the retail business by transitioning from manual, labor-intensive processes to automated, robot-driven operations. This parameter change fundamentally alters the cost structure, reducing variable labor costs while maintaining fixed infrastructure costs, thereby enabling multi-channel expansion without proportional cost increases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11142402B2Automated-service retail system and method
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 SYMBOTIC LLC
  • US11142402B2 patent drawing
  • US11142402B2 patent drawing
  • US11142402B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A combination automated-service and self-service store for implementation at brick-and-mortar retail locations is provided. The store and corresponding method of implementation is an automated-service model in which robots, deployed at the brick-and-mortar location, fill orders for fungible goods placed by customers either online or in-store. The store also includes a shopping section where customers can select/order items and/or personally select non-fungible goods. The store includes a shopping section for non-fungible goods that customers prefer to pick out by hand and a back end automated order fulfillment section for other goods (e.g., fungible goods, dry goods, etc.). The two sets of goods are merged to a delivery bundle and delivered together for pickup by the customer. The combination automated-service and self-service store combines the convenience of online shopping and self-service shopping using an unconventional approach that reduces costs for the retailer and simultaneously increases customer satisfaction.