Hybrid Side Rail Assembly for Lightweight Side-Impact Energy Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing side rails in vehicles do not effectively absorb energy from side impacts while minimizing weight, particularly in side pole impacts, which can damage critical components like electric vehicle battery boxes.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid energy absorbing side rail assembly comprising a metal inner and outer rail with a plastic energy absorber array, optimized through roll forming and injection molding, respectively, to provide tailored geometry and weight reduction, and coated with electrostatic paint for enhanced protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional solid metal side rails are used, then strength and impact resistance are improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidside rail weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The side rail employs a composite structure combining metal rails (inner and outer) with a plastic energy absorber material filled within the cavity. This composite approach allows the metal components to provide structural strength and attachment points, while the plastic filler absorbs impact energy, achieving both high strength and weight reduction compared to solid metal rails

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The side rail is divided into multiple functional segments: inner metal rail for structural support, outer metal rail for protection and attachment, and plastic energy absorber material filling the cavity. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, with the plastic material providing lightweight energy absorption while metal components provide strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Weight of moving object

If lighter materials are used for side rails, then weight is reduced, but energy absorption capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside rail weightVSAvoidimpact energy absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The plastic energy absorber material is selected specifically for its high energy absorption properties per unit weight. When filled within the metal rail cavity, this lightweight material provides superior specific energy absorption compared to traditional solid metal structures, achieving both weight reduction and improved energy absorption capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The plastic energy absorber material's properties (density, strength, ductility) are optimized to maximize energy absorption during impact. The material parameters are selected and tuned to provide optimal crashworthiness while maintaining lightweight characteristics, allowing the structure to deform and absorb energy efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If complex energy absorption structures are implemented, then energy absorption is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process merges multiple operations into integrated steps: the inner and outer metal rails are formed using roll forming, the plastic energy absorber is molded in one piece using injection molding, and the components are assembled by filling the cavity. This consolidation of processes reduces manufacturing complexity compared to assembling multiple complex energy absorption components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The plastic energy absorber's geometry and material properties are optimized through parameter adjustment during injection molding to achieve the desired energy absorption performance. By controlling mold design, injection parameters, and material formulation, the complex energy absorption function is achieved through a relatively simple single-piece molded component rather than multiple assembled parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The assembly efficiently absorbs energy during side impacts, protecting vehicle components while maintaining a lightweight design, meeting safety standards and reducing manufacturing costs.

Implementation Method 1

at least one energy absorber housed in the cavity. The at least one energy absorber is positioned in-line with the triggers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

coating the energy absorbing side rail includes electrostatic coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deposition: Electrostatic Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS12441405B2Energy absorbing side rail
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 FLEX N GATE ADVANCED PROD DEV LLC
  • US12441405B2 patent drawing
  • US12441405B2 patent drawing
  • US12441405B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy absorbing side rail including an inner rail, an outer rail fixedly coupled to the inner rail defining a cavity, the outer rail defining triggers extending along at least a portion of the outer rail, and at least one energy absorber housed in the cavity, wherein at least one energy absorber is positioned in-line with the triggers.