Hybrid Soap Dispenser Actuation for Power-Outage Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional liquid dispensers rely exclusively on either manual or electric operation, leading to issues such as inability to function during power outages, increased maintenance, and potential vandalism due to reliability concerns.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid dispenser apparatus that combines manual and electric operation by using a cabinet with a movable cover and an actuator mechanism, incorporating both a manual pump and an electric motor to ensure continuous soap access, reducing reliance on batteries and maintenance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the dispenser is dedicated to electrically operated system, then dispensing automation is improved, but reliability during power outage deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing automationVSAvoidreliability during power outage
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dispenser is designed to perform multiple functions: it can operate automatically via electric motor when powered, and manually via cover movement when powerless. The actuator mechanism serves dual purposes - it can be driven by electric motor for automated dispensing or by manual cover movement for manual operation, making the system universal and adaptable to different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between electric motor-driven operation and manual operation based on power availability. The actuator mechanism is designed to accept input from either the electric motor or direct manual manipulation through the cover, allowing the dispenser to adapt its mode of operation to current conditions, thereby maintaining reliability during power outages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If the dispenser relies on batteries, then automated operation is improved, but maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated operationVSAvoidmaintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The manual operation capability allows users to service the dispenser themselves by simply moving the cover to actuate the pump, eliminating the need for complex battery replacements or electrical repairs. The system can continue to function in manual mode even when electrical components require maintenance, reducing overall maintenance burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The dual operation system provides redundancy - if electrical components need maintenance, the dispenser can continue operating manually. This reduces the impact of maintenance requirements on overall system availability and reduces the frequency of service interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the dispenser is manually operated, then simplicity is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesimplicityVSAvoiddispensing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges manual and electric operation systems into a single unified dispenser. The manual cover movement and electric motor both drive the same actuator mechanism and pump, combining the simplicity of manual operation with the automated efficiency of electric operation in one integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects between manual and electric operation modes based on needs. When high productivity is required, the electric motor provides automated dispensing. When simplicity or power independence is needed, manual operation via cover movement is used. This dynamic flexibility allows the system to optimize for either simplicity or productivity as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hybrid dispenser ensures consistent soap availability, reducing complaints and vandalism by allowing operation through either manual or electric power, minimizing maintenance issues and ensuring soap access regardless of power availability.

Implementation Method 1

an electric motor (40) disposed in the housing; a pump connectable to the liquid material container to dispense liquid from the container; and an actuator mechanism (30) operatively associated with the pump to dispense liquid from the liquid material container in response to operation of the electric motor (40)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

various mechanisms for pumping or exerting pressure on the liquid to facilitate dispensing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP3094226B1Dispenser apparatus for dispensing liquid soap, lotion or other liquid
Publication Date: 2024.06.05 DISPENSING DYNAMICS INT LLC
  • EP3094226B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3094226B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP3094226B1 patent drawingFigure 7~10

AI summary

Dispenser apparatus for manually or power dispensing liquid soap or other liquids from a container. The apparatus includes an actuator for actuating a dispensing structure either by an electric motor or by manual movement of a cover of the dispenser that contains the liquid container and actuator.