Hybrid Spreading Risk Management System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current risk management and financial surveillance systems in futures exchanges face challenges in accurately and flexibly estimating performance bond requirements, which can lead to inadequate protection against potential losses and increased operational burdens on members.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of the Standard Portfolio Analysis of Risk (SPAN) system, which calculates performance bond requirements based on historical and current market data, using statistical and parametric analysis, and considers factors like underlying futures price, volatility, and time to expiration, to simulate potential losses and provide a risk array analysis across various scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional risk management systems are used to estimate performance bond requirements, then the system is simpler to implement, but the accuracy and flexibility of loss protection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance bond estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using statistical and parametric analysis to dynamically adjust performance bond requirements based on multiple market parameters including underlying futures price, volatility, and time to expiration. The SPAN system calculates risk arrays across various scenarios by changing these parameters to simulate potential losses, thereby improving estimation accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through standardized computational approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If performance bond requirements are increased to improve protection against potential losses, then the reliability of the clearing system is improved, but the operational burden on members increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearing system reliabilityVSAvoidoperational burden on members
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by calculating performance bond requirements based on simulated potential losses across various scenarios rather than requiring excessive bonds for all possible market conditions. The SPAN system identifies the maximum potential loss from a set of predefined scenarios and sets bonds at that level, providing adequate protection without imposing unnecessarily high requirements on members, thus balancing reliability with operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Stability of the object's composition

If uniform treatment of futures and options is applied, then the system consistency is improved, but the ability to recognize unique risk characteristics is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem consistencyVSAvoidrisk characteristic recognition
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating futures and options with uniform procedural consistency while incorporating instrument-specific risk characteristics into the calculation model. The SPAN system uses different parameters and scenario assumptions tailored to each instrument type (e.g., volatility measures for options, price movements for futures) within the overall unified framework, thereby maintaining system consistency while accurately recognizing unique risk profiles of different financial instruments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8073764B2System and method for hybrid spreading for risk management
Publication Date: 2011.12.06 CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC
  • US8073764B2 patent drawing
  • US8073764B2 patent drawing
  • US8073764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A risk management system and method is disclosed which utilizes a flexible and configurable set of spreading techniques which may be incorporated into existing risk management software to enhance functionality, flexibility and accuracy. In the disclosed embodiments, multiple different types of spreading are combined to allow for a more accurate assessment of risk. In one exemplary embodiment, a subset of the derivative products held by a futures trader are first analyzed by the scanning based spreading methodology. Typically, futures products in the same class of products (e.g. equity futures or agricultural futures) would be analyzed together by the scanning based spreading methodology. Then an average delta would be calculated for that subset. Using that delta, that subset would then be analyzed in relation to the remaining derivative products (not in the subset) using a delta based spreading methodology. The delta for the subset could be computed in a variety of ways including scaling the deltas for each product, tying the delta to a fixed time period or other methods.