Hybrid Surrogate Physics Model Balancing Accuracy and Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deep learning-based surrogate models, while reducing computational load, may be less accurate during extreme events due to sparse training data, and existing methods lack effective strategies for balancing their deployment with physics-based models in complex simulations like weather or financial forecasts.

Innovation Solution

A system that runs a deep learning-based surrogate model and partially runs a physics-based model to check reliability, using a comparison module to determine accuracy and switch between models, with online training of the surrogate model using high-fidelity data from the physics-based model to maintain performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a deep learning based surrogate model is used to reduce computational load, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates under extreme events due to sparse training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy during extreme events
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a deep learning based surrogate model with a physics based mathematical model into a hybrid system. The surrogate model handles normal conditions efficiently, while the physics based model ensures accuracy during extreme events. The system dynamically switches between or blends outputs from both models, merging their complementary strengths to achieve both computational efficiency and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a switching mechanism or gating network as an intermediary that determines when to use the surrogate model and when to rely on the physics based model. This intermediary component monitors system state or uncertainty levels and routes queries to the appropriate model, ensuring reliability during extreme events while maintaining computational efficiency during normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a physics based mathematical model is used to ensure accuracy, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to high computational requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of simulation resultsVSAvoidcomputational speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using the computationally expensive physics based model only partially - specifically during extreme events or when the surrogate model's predictions fall outside its reliable range. For normal conditions, the system relies on the efficient surrogate model, thus avoiding unnecessary computational overhead while maintaining accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the simulation domain or time periods into regions where the surrogate model is sufficient and regions where the physics based model is required. This segmentation allows the system to apply computational resources selectively, using the high-fidelity physics based model only where and when it is necessary for accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If the physics based model is run fully to verify surrogate model reliability, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses partial running of the physics based model for verification purposes - rather than always executing the full physics based model, it runs the model partially or selectively to verify surrogate model predictions only when necessary, such as during extreme events or at periodic intervals, thus reducing time loss while maintaining verification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20220180174A1Using a deep learning based surrogate model in a simulation
Publication Date: 2022.06.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20220180174A1 patent drawing
  • US20220180174A1 patent drawing
  • US20220180174A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method, a computer program product, and a computer system for optimally balancing deployment of a deep learning based surrogate model and a physics based mathematical model in simulating a complex problem. One or more computing devices or servers compare results of running the deep learning based surrogate model with results of partially running the physics based mathematical model or with observations. One or more computing devices or severs output the results of running the deep learning based surrogate model as system outputs of simulating the complex problem, in response to determining that the deep learning based surrogate model is reliable. One or more computing devices or servers output results of running the physics based mathematical model as the system outputs of simulating the complex problem, in response to determining that the deep learning based surrogate model is not reliable.