Hybrid Electrical Switching for Galvanic Isolation and Inrush Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical switching systems face challenges in efficiently and safely managing the switching of electrical currents, particularly in preventing inrush currents and ensuring galvanic isolation, especially when dealing with high-voltage and high-frequency applications, where traditional electromechanical and non-mechanical switches have limitations in cost, reliability, and safety.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a switching system that combines electromechanical switches with non-mechanical switching units, such as transistors, arranged in series and parallel configurations to provide galvanic isolation and safer switching operations. This configuration allows for the establishment of a parallel path to circumvent electromechanical switches during switching, reducing the risk of inrush currents and enabling safer and more efficient switching by ensuring that electromechanical switches operate under zero-current conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional electromechanical switches are used for electrical switching, then galvanic isolation is provided, but inrush currents occur and switching reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching reliabilityVSAvoidinrush currents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A diode is introduced as an intermediary component connected in parallel with the electromechanical switch. The diode provides an alternative current path during switching transitions, preventing inrush currents from damaging the switch contacts while maintaining galvanic isolation. The diode conducts during the transition period, acting as a mediator that protects the switch from harmful current spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by establishing a safe switching sequence where the electromechanical switch is opened before the transistor switches on. This preliminary timing arrangement ensures that the electromechanical switch operates under zero-current conditions, preventing inrush currents and extending switch life while maintaining reliable galvanic isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If non-mechanical switches (transistors) are used for electrical switching, then inrush currents are reduced, but galvanic isolation is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinrush currentsVSAvoidgalvanic isolation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges two different switching technologies into a single hybrid system: an electromechanical switch for providing galvanic isolation and a transistor for enabling controlled switching without inrush currents. The two components work together in a coordinated manner, with the transistor handling the switching transitions and the electromechanical switch providing the isolation barrier, thus combining the advantages of both technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The diode serves as an intermediary that enables the transistor to switch without causing inrush currents to the electromechanical switch. It provides a bypass path for current during the transition period, allowing the transistor to perform its switching function while protecting the electromechanical switch, thus maintaining both galvanic isolation and preventing harmful current spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If electromechanical switches operate under load, then switching capability is maintained, but contact wear increases and safety decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching capabilityVSAvoidcontact durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary action by timing the switching events to ensure the electromechanical switch opens before current is applied to the load. This preliminary timing arrangement ensures that the electromechanical switch contacts are never subjected to arcing or high-current stress, eliminating contact wear and extending durability while maintaining full switching capability through the transistor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention substitutes the mechanical switching function with an electronic transistor for the actual current switching operation. The transistor, being a solid-state device, handles the switching of load current without mechanical contact wear, while the electromechanical switch is relegated to providing galvanic isolation only, thus eliminating the contradiction between maintaining switching capability and preventing contact wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If hybrid switching arrangements are implemented, then safety and efficiency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges two switching mechanisms into a unified hybrid system where the electromechanical switch and transistor work together as an integrated unit. The diode connects them in a specific configuration that allows automatic coordination of their operations, reducing the need for complex external control circuitry while maintaining improved safety and efficiency benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the safety and efficiency of electrical switching by reducing the risk of inrush currents and providing galvanic isolation, while also offering cost-effective and reliable operation, particularly in high-voltage and high-frequency applications.

Implementation Method 1

An electromechanical switch (e.g., an electromechanical relay) may provide advantages such as galvanic isolation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGalvanic isolation:

Implementation Method 2

The switching unit may include non-mechanical switches, such as transistors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS12176740B2Method and apparatus for electrical switching
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 SOLAREDGE TECH LTD
  • US12176740B2 patent drawing
  • US12176740B2 patent drawing
  • US12176740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods are described for electrical switching. In some examples, electrical switching is performed by a plurality of switching arrangements. The plurality of switching arrangements may be connected in parallel to one another.