Hybrid Turbo-Electric Propulsion Control for Rotor Stall Elimination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack effective methods for modeling and controlling turbo-electric distributed propulsion (TeDP) systems in aircraft, particularly for stable, efficient, and fault-tolerant operation during dynamic missions, as they fail to provide comprehensive dynamic models and control designs that optimize performance across varying conditions.

Innovation Solution

A multi-layered energy-based modeling and control method is introduced, utilizing dynamics of stored energy and rate of change of stored energy to coordinate power interactions between engine and electric systems, ensuring stable and efficient operation through nonlinear control and predictive optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional single-spool aircraft designs are used, then engine design is simpler, but rotor stall and surge instabilities occur during highly dynamic missions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine design complexityVSAvoidengine stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft propulsion system is segmented into separate turbo-engine and electric propulsion modules, allowing independent optimization of each. The turbo-engine operates in a stable regime while electric motors handle dynamic power demands, eliminating rotor stall and surge instabilities without requiring complex oversizing of the engine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static engine sizing to dynamic power management by introducing electric propulsion modules that can rapidly adjust power output. This dynamic configuration allows the turbo-engine to operate within stable operating ranges while electric motors compensate for rapid power changes during maneuvering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If oversized engine design is used to avoid engine instabilities, then engine stability is improved, but aircraft weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine stabilityVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges conventional turbo-engine propulsion with electric propulsion modules to create a hybrid system. This combination allows the turbo-engine to be sized for efficient cruise operation without the weight penalty of oversizing for dynamic maneuvers, while electric motors provide the additional power capacity needed for maneuvering without increasing engine weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Electric propulsion modules act as intermediaries between the turbo-engine and the aircraft's power demands. During highly dynamic missions, electric motors absorb or supply power as needed, shielding the turbo-engine from rapid load changes that would cause instabilities, thereby eliminating the need for oversized engine design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If TeDP systems are designed for highly dynamic missions, then adaptability is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into modular components, each managing specific functions of the turbo-electric propulsion system. This modular architecture allows independent control of engine parameters, electric motor parameters, and power distribution, simplifying the overall control complexity while maintaining high adaptability to different mission requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the operating mode and power distribution between turbo-engine and electric motors based on real-time mission requirements. This dynamic control strategy enables the system to adapt to highly dynamic missions with varying power demands without requiring overly complex control algorithms, as the control logic follows the natural dynamics of power demand changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12037126B1Exergy/energy dynamics-based integrative modeling and control method for difficult electric aircraft missions
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 SMARTGRIDZ INC
  • US12037126B1 patent drawing
  • US12037126B1 patent drawing
  • US12037126B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a fundamental modeling and control method in dynamic energy conversion and transfers in complex energy systems with multiple energy sources, fuel and electric. The multi-layered modeling enables efficient and stable operation through optimized coordination of engines and electric part of a hybrid turbo-electric distribution system (TeDP). A provable coordination of power and rate of change of power interactions between the components is done at the higher-system level. Advanced nonlinear control of components is disclosed to ensure that components meet power/rate of change of power commands given by the higher level. This method is used to demonstrate, for the first time, how rotor stall and surge instabilities in engines can be eliminated by controlling the electric generators and/or storage.