Automated Toolpath Planning for Hybrid Additive-Subtractive Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determination of toolpaths for part fabrication, especially combined additive and subtractive techniques, is complex and time-consuming, leading to inefficiencies in fabrication processes.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automated toolpath generation that includes receiving a virtual part, modifying it for fabrication, determining efficient toolpaths, and generating machine instructions for both additive and subtractive processes, allowing for semi-automated workflow and reduced material waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated toolpath generation is implemented, then fabrication efficiency is improved and material waste is reduced, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated toolpath generation that determines its own fabrication parameters and paths without requiring manual intervention. The algorithm automatically analyzes the part geometry, selects appropriate manufacturing operations, and generates optimized toolpaths, allowing the system to serve itself in the complex task of process planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical process planning with an automated computational algorithm. Instead of operators manually determining toolpaths through experience and trial-and-error, a computer-based system uses geometric analysis and optimization algorithms to automatically generate fabrication paths, substituting human mechanical reasoning with automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If combined additive and subtractive techniques are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the determination of toolpaths becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart fabrication precisionVSAvoidtoolpath determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges additive and subtractive manufacturing operations into a unified automated toolpath generation process. The algorithm simultaneously plans both material deposition and removal operations, coordinating them to achieve precise part fabrication. This integration allows the system to leverage the strengths of both techniques while automating the complex coordination required between them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the fabrication process into distinct additive and subtractive operations that can be independently optimized and then coordinated. The automated system divides the overall toolpath into separate phases for material addition and removal, allowing each to be planned with appropriate parameters and strategies while maintaining overall process integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If more material is removed subtractively, then manufacturing precision is improved, but material waste increases and fabrication time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial subtractive action by performing only the minimum necessary material removal to achieve the desired surface finish and dimensional accuracy. Rather than over-machining parts, the automated toolpath generation calculates the precise amount of material that needs to be removed, applying subtractive operations only where and to the extent needed, thus reducing material waste while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of subtractive operations by optimizing cutting depths, feed rates, and tool paths based on the specific part geometry and required precision. The automated system adjusts these parameters to achieve high surface finish quality with minimal material removal, rather than using fixed or conservative machining parameters that would remove excessive material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11662711B2Method and system for automated toolpath generation
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 MANTLE INC
  • US11662711B2 patent drawing
  • US11662711B2 patent drawing
  • US11662711B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for facilitating part fabrication, such as by automated toolpath generation, can include one or more of: receiving a virtual part; modifying the virtual part; and/or determining toolpaths to fabricate the target part. The toolpaths preferably define an ordered series of additive and subtractive toolpaths, more preferably wherein the additive and subtractive toolpaths are interleaved, which can function to achieve high manufacturing efficiency and/or performance. The method can additionally or alternatively include: generating machine instructions based on the toolpaths; fabricating the target part based on the machine instructions; calibrating the fabrication system; and/or any other suitable elements.