Automated Hybrid Toolpath Planning for Additive-Subtractive Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determination of toolpaths for part fabrication, especially by combined additive and subtractive techniques, is complex and time-consuming, leading to inefficiencies in fabrication time and material usage.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automated toolpath generation that includes receiving a virtual part, modifying it for fabrication, and determining efficient additive and subtractive toolpaths, allowing for autonomous fabrication with reduced material waste and improved efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated toolpath generation is implemented, then productivity and fabrication efficiency are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated toolpath generation where the fabrication system itself determines optimal toolpaths without external intervention. The controller autonomously processes part geometry, selects appropriate operations, and generates toolpaths, enabling the system to serve itself in the path planning function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual toolpath planning (mechanical/human operation) is replaced with automated computational algorithms. The system uses computer-based processing to determine toolpaths, substituting human expertise and manual calculation with algorithmic automation that integrates with the fabrication control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If combined additive and subtractive techniques are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to complex toolpath determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart fabrication precisionVSAvoidtoolpath determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges additive and subtractive fabrication operations into a unified toolpath generation process. The controller integrates both operation types, allowing seamless transitions between material deposition and removal within the same automated workflow, optimizing the combined process for both precision and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of part geometry and requirements before generating toolpaths. By pre-processing the part data, identifying features, and determining appropriate operations in advance, the system reduces the time required during actual fabrication while ensuring high precision outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If manual toolpath determination is performed, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time and material inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidfabrication time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The fabrication system autonomously determines toolpaths without requiring manual intervention. The controller self-manages the entire process from part interpretation to toolpath generation, eliminating the time loss associated with manual planning while maintaining system simplicity through integrated automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of substance

If automated toolpath generation is implemented, then loss of substance is reduced through optimized material usage, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial wasteVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual material planning is replaced with automated computational algorithms that optimize material usage. The system calculates precise material requirements, optimizes deposition patterns, and minimizes waste through algorithmic control, substituting human estimation with precision computing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250362660A1Method and system for automated toolpath generation
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 MANTLE INC
  • US20250362660A1 patent drawing
  • US20250362660A1 patent drawing
  • US20250362660A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for facilitating part fabrication, such as by automated toolpath generation, can include one or more of: receiving a virtual part; modifying the virtual part; and/or determining toolpaths to fabricate the target part. The toolpaths preferably define an ordered series of additive and subtractive toolpaths, more preferably wherein the additive and subtractive toolpaths are interleaved, which can function to achieve high manufacturing efficiency and/or performance. The method can additionally or alternatively include: generating machine instructions based on the toolpaths; fabricating the target part based on the machine instructions; calibrating the fabrication system; and/or any other suitable elements.