Hybrid Touch Screen for Hovering Input Effects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Touch screens in electronic devices can only receive input through direct contact, limiting the interface to direct touch effects and lacking the ability to provide other input methods beyond finger or pen touch.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device and method that senses the position and height of an input means above the screen, allowing for hovering input effects such as brush writing, chisel, spray, droplet falling, ink spreading, and stamp effects, using a hybrid touch screen with capacitive and ElectroMagnetic Resonance (EMR) panels to distinguish between touch and hover inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional capacitive touch screen is used, then direct touch input can be detected, but hovering input effects cannot be provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput method varietyVSAvoidtouch screen structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a capacitive touch panel and an EMR touch panel into a hybrid touch screen structure. The capacitive panel detects finger touches while the EMR panel detects hovering pens, allowing both direct touch and hovering input methods to coexist in a single device without requiring separate sensing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hybrid touch screen serves multiple functions: it detects both direct finger touches and hovering pen inputs, and it provides different input effects based on the detected input type. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by enabling versatile input methods while using a unified touch screen structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If only direct touch is supported, then the interface is simple, but hovering input effects such as brush writing, chisel, spray, and ink spreading cannot be displayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput effect varietyVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic input effects that change based on the hovering height and movement of the pen. Effects such as brush writing, chisel, spray, and ink spreading are dynamically displayed according to the detected height information, allowing the interface to adaptively provide diverse effects without requiring separate static interfaces for each effect type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses height parameter detection to control the display of different input effects. By monitoring changes in the hovering height parameter, the system dynamically switches between various input effects (brush writing, chisel, spray, etc.), enabling versatile input effects while maintaining a unified interface structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a hybrid touch screen with EMR and capacitive panels is used, then hovering and touch inputs can be distinguished, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput detection accuracyVSAvoidtouch panel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the touch sensing function into two separate panels: a capacitive touch panel for detecting finger touches and an EMR touch panel for detecting hovering pens. This segmentation allows each panel to be optimized for its specific detection task, improving measurement precision while keeping the overall structure modular and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an EMR touch panel as an intermediary layer between the capacitive panel and the user's hovering pen. The EMR panel specifically detects hovering inputs without interfering with finger touch detection by the capacitive panel, enabling precise distinction between different input types through the intermediary's specialized sensing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the display of various input effects in an input area based on the height and position of the input means, enhancing user interaction by providing hovering input functionality beyond traditional direct touch.

Implementation Method 1

The touch pen may include a coil and the display may include a touch screen. The touch screen may include an ElectroMagnetic Resonance (EMR) touch panel for sensing the touch pen based on EMR.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

An electronic device and method that senses the position and height of an input means above the screen, allowing for hovering input effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9898139B2Electronic device for providing hovering input effects and method for controlling the same
Publication Date: 2018.02.20 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9898139B2 patent drawing
  • US9898139B2 patent drawing
  • US9898139B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device for hovering input effects and a method for controlling the same are provided. The method includes displaying an input area on a display of the electronic device, sensing at least one of a position of an input means on the display and a height of the input means above the display, and displaying a hovering input effect, corresponding to a hovering input using the input means, in the input area.