Hybrid Trajectory Prediction for Vehicle Interaction Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for determining the expected trajectory of objects, such as vehicles or pedestrians, in partially autonomous vehicles lack efficiency and reliability, particularly in modeling interactions with other vehicles and accurately predicting long-term movements.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that combines machine-learning and model-based methods to predict or reconstruct trajectories, using sensor data like radar, lidar, and camera data, by fusing intermediate data from both approaches through a neural network-based fusion network, which incorporates learnable parameters to improve prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a model-based method is used to predict trajectory, then the prediction follows physical laws, but it cannot accurately describe complex interactions with other vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidinteraction modeling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines model-based prediction (providing physical law compliance) with machine-learning-based prediction (providing interaction modeling capability) into a unified hybrid system. The model-based component ensures predictions follow physical laws, while the machine-learning component learns complex interaction patterns from data, together resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction system uses a composite approach by integrating two different prediction methodologies (model-based and machine-learning-based) into a single hybrid system. This composite structure allows the system to leverage the strengths of both approaches: the physical correctness of model-based methods and the adaptive interaction modeling of machine learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If machine-learning method is used to learn complex interactions, then the interaction modeling improves, but the system cannot fully replace known physical models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction modeling capabilityVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges machine-learning-based prediction with model-based prediction in a hybrid system. The machine-learning component handles complex interaction modeling while the model-based component ensures physical law compliance, together resolving the contradiction between adaptability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hybrid system acts as an intermediary that combines the outputs or intermediate representations from both machine-learning and model-based methods. This intermediary structure allows the system to leverage both approaches without fully replacing either, maintaining reliability while improving interaction modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If only model-based method is used, then the system is simpler, but the long-term trajectory prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidtrajectory prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines model-based and machine-learning-based prediction methods into a hybrid system that achieves superior long-term trajectory prediction accuracy. The integration allows the system to capture both physical laws and complex interaction patterns, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If only machine-learning method is used, then the interaction modeling improves, but the system loses interpretability and physical law compliance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction modeling capabilityVSAvoidsystem interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges machine-learning-based prediction with model-based prediction, where the model-based component provides interpretability and physical law compliance while the machine-learning component provides interaction modeling capability. This combination resolves the contradiction between adaptability and interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11941509B2Method and system for determining information on an expected trajectory of an object
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US11941509B2 patent drawing
  • US11941509B2 patent drawing
  • US11941509B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining information on an expected trajectory of an object comprises: determining input data being related to the expected trajectory of the object; determining first intermediate data based on the input data using a machine-learning method; determining second intermediate data based on the input data using a model-based method; and determining the information on the expected trajectory of the object based on the first intermediate data and based on the second intermediate data.