Hybrid Unequal Error Protection for Heterogeneous Multi-Service Provisioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communications systems face inefficiencies in resource utilization when handling heterogeneous multiservice data due to the use of symmetric modulation, which does not adequately meet the varying Quality of Service (QoS) requirements across different services, leading to suboptimal energy and spectral efficiency, especially in contested mobile environments with variable link quality.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Adaptive Multiresolution Modulation (AMM) and Hybrid Unequal Error Protection (UEP) systems, which adaptively adjust the asymmetric signal constellation and Forward Error Correction (FEC) coding rates based on network conditions to prioritize and protect different types of data, ensuring efficient resource utilization and meeting distinct QoS requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If symmetric modulation is used to ensure uniform protection for all data, then reliability is improved, but spectral efficiency deteriorates due to over-protection of tolerant data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different error protection levels to different portions of data based on their QoS requirements. Critical data receives stronger protection while tolerant data receives weaker protection, optimizing the overall system efficiency by matching protection levels to actual needs rather than applying uniform protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric modulation schemes where the signal constellation is deliberately made asymmetric to provide unequal error protection. This allows different bits or data portions to have different minimum distances to decision boundaries, thereby achieving differential protection levels within the same modulation scheme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If modulation adapts to meet the most stringent QoS requirement, then reliability of critical data is improved, but energy efficiency deteriorates due to over-compensation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS requirement fulfillmentVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different modulation and coding parameters to different data streams based on their specific QoS requirements. Critical data uses more robust modulation with higher energy cost while tolerant data uses less robust modulation with lower energy cost, thereby optimizing overall energy efficiency while meeting all QoS requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of modulation and coding parameters based on real-time channel conditions and QoS requirements. The system can dynamically switch between different modulation schemes and adjust coding rates to optimize the trade-off between reliability and energy consumption under varying operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If asymmetric signal constellation is used for UEP, then spectral efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidmodulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric signal constellations where the geometric arrangement of constellation points is deliberately made asymmetric to provide unequal error protection. This allows the system to achieve spectral efficiency gains by packing more bits per symbol while providing differential protection, though it does increase demodulation and decoding complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS20210194620A1Hybrid Unequal Error Protection (UEP) for Heterogeneous Multi-Service Provisioning
Publication Date: 2021.06.24 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US20210194620A1 patent drawing
  • US20210194620A1 patent drawing
  • US20210194620A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system are discussed for providing Unequal Error Protection (UEP) for heterogeneous multi-service provisioning. A transmitter in a network may determine a current status of the network. The transmitter may adaptively adjust a current asymmetric signal constellation and a current channel Forward Error Correction (FEC) coding rate based on the determined current status of the network, and initiate transmission of multi-service data, using the adaptively adjusted asymmetric signal constellation and the adaptively adjusted FEC coding rate for transmission of the multi-service data, based on hybrid Unequal Error Protection (UEP) transmission.