Hydrate Inhibitor Injection Control for Hydrocarbon Flow Assurance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydrate formation in hydrocarbon extraction operations is a concern due to the excessive use of hydrate inhibitors, which increases costs unnecessarily.

Innovation Solution

An additive management system that includes sensors, flow meters, and a controller to monitor and control the injection of hydrate inhibitors, optimizing their use based on real-time data and environmental conditions to prevent hydrate formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydrate inhibitors are used excessively to prevent hydrate formation, then the reliability of preventing hydrate formation is improved, but the cost of hydrocarbon extraction operations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrate formation preventionVSAvoidhydrate inhibitor usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs sensors to continuously monitor hydrate formation conditions (temperature, pressure, water content) and feeds this information back to the controller, which adjusts the hydrate inhibitor injection rate dynamically. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures reliable hydrate prevention while optimizing inhibitor usage by responding only when and where hydrate formation risk exists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The injection rate of hydrate inhibitors is made dynamic rather than static, allowing the system to adapt the inhibitor dosage to changing operational conditions such as temperature fluctuations, pressure changes, and water content variations. This dynamic adjustment prevents both over-injection and under-injection of inhibitors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If hydrate inhibitors are used excessively to prevent hydrate formation, then the reliability of preventing hydrate formation is improved, but the cost of hydrocarbon extraction operations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrate formation preventionVSAvoidinjection control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to be self-regulating, where the controller automatically adjusts injection rates based on sensor feedback without requiring constant manual intervention. The system monitors its own performance and self-corrects to maintain optimal hydrate prevention, reducing the need for complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The controller serves multiple functions: it processes data from multiple sensors, calculates hydrate formation risk, determines optimal injection rates, and controls the injection mechanism. This multi-functionality consolidates what could be multiple separate systems into a single integrated control unit, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If hydrate inhibitors are injected continuously, then the reliability of preventing hydrate formation is improved, but the loss of substance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrate formation preventionVSAvoidhydrate inhibitor waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous injection, the system implements periodic or on-demand injection based on detected hydrate formation conditions. The controller activates injection only when sensors detect conditions favorable to hydrate formation (specific temperature, pressure, and water content combinations), and suspends injection when conditions are safe, eliminating unnecessary inhibitor waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies hydrate inhibitors locally and selectively to specific zones or time periods where hydrate formation risk is detected, rather than applying them uniformly throughout the entire hydrocarbon extraction process. This targeted approach prevents waste in areas or times where hydrate formation is not a threat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables precise and targeted control of hydrate inhibitor injection, reducing the likelihood of hydrate formation while minimizing the use of inhibitors, thus optimizing operational efficiency and cost.

Implementation Method 1

determine a ratio of an injected chemical to water in the fluid flow based at least in part on a first electromagnetic property of the fluid flow upstream of the injection point and a second electromagnetic property of the fluid flow downstream of the injection point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic properties measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS12398329B2Additive management system
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 ONESUBSEA IP UK LTD
  • US12398329B2 patent drawing
  • US12398329B2 patent drawing
  • US12398329B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including an additive management system configured to oversee hydrate formation in a hydrocarbon extraction system, the additive management system including a flow meter configured to measure a fluid flow rate, a first sensor configured to measure at least one of a fluid property and an environmental condition, and a chemical injection device configured to inject a hydrate inhibitor into a fluid flow.