Hydrate Formation Prediction in Drilling Risers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The offshore drilling industry faces challenges in predicting hydrate formation risks, particularly in deep water with low temperatures and high pressures, leading to increased risks of hydrates plugging subsea BOP and choke lines, especially with managed pressure drilling techniques.

Innovation Solution

A method involving continuous logging and measurement of mud properties and pressure/temperature data, determining a theoretical hydrate formation temperature profile, and comparing it with actual data to issue warnings and guide remedial actions, including the use of sensors and control systems to prevent hydrate formation and plugging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If managed pressure drilling (MPD) is used to control well pressure, then well pressure control is improved, but the risk of hydrate formation in the riser increases due to higher pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewell pressure controlVSAvoidhydrate formation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of the hydrate formation temperature profile based on measured pressure data and mud properties before hydrates actually form. This allows proactive identification of conditions where hydrates may form, enabling preventive action before the harmful effect occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously measures actual pressure data and temperature data, compares these measurements with the calculated hydrate formation temperature profile, and provides feedback when the actual temperature approaches the formation temperature. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows real-time monitoring and adjustment to prevent hydrate formation while maintaining MPD pressure control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If large amounts of water or sacrificial fluids are pumped down the well to address lost circulation, then lost circulation is controlled, but the well temperature decreases and hydrate risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelost circulation controlVSAvoidwell temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates the hydrate formation temperature profile in advance based on expected pressure conditions and mud properties. When cold fluids are pumped to control lost circulation, the system proactively identifies the resulting temperature drop and warns of approaching hydrate formation conditions before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual temperature data and compares it against the pre-calculated hydrate formation temperature profile. When the actual temperature approaches the formation temperature due to cold fluid injection, the feedback mechanism triggers warnings and allows corrective action to maintain safe operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If conventional well monitoring systems are used, then simple monitoring is maintained, but they cannot predict hydrate formation risk in advance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidhydrate formation prediction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of the hydrate formation temperature profile based on measured pressure data and mud properties before hydrates actually form. This proactive approach provides prediction capability without requiring complex real-time modeling, adding only the necessary computational step to existing monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the need for complex predictive modeling with a calculation-based approach using measured pressure data and established hydrate formation relationships. This substitution provides accurate prediction capability while maintaining relatively simple system architecture based on standard sensors and computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively predicts hydrate formation risks and provides timely remedial actions to prevent incidents, ensuring safe drilling operations by accurately monitoring and managing hydrate formation temperatures and pressures in wellbores and riser annuli.

Implementation Method 1

determining a theoretical temperature profile for the formation of hydrates dependent on mud properties and pressure as a function of a true vertical depth in a well

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrate formation: Hydrates

Data Source

PatentUS9828847B2Method for predicting hydrate formation
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 FUTURE WELL CONTROL AS
  • US9828847B2 patent drawing
  • US9828847B2 patent drawing
  • US9828847B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting a formation of hydrates in a wellbore/riser annulus during a drilling operation. The method includes logging actual mud properties. Actual sets of pressure and temperature data at given locations/intervals in the wellbore or in the drilling riser annulus are continuously measured and/or calculated. A theoretical temperature profile for the formation of hydrates dependent on mud properties and pressure as a function of a true vertical depth in a well is determined. The theoretical temperature profile for the formation of hydrates in a control system is stored. The measured and/or calculated actual sets of pressure and temperature data is compared with the theoretical temperature profile for the formation of hydrates. A signal is issued if the measured and/or calculated actual sets of pressure and temperature data falls below or is lower than a predefined safety margin for the theoretical temperature profile for the formation of hydrates.