Hydration Bladder Rigid Structural Portions Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hydration bladders lack structural support and ease of handling, making them difficult to manipulate and use effectively, especially when filled or empty.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating relatively rigid structural portions and flexible wall portions to provide stiffness, grip features, and improved port designs, such as screw ports, cap assemblies, and strut members, which enhance the bladder's shape, handling, and fluid dispensing capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional flexible walls are used in hydration bladders, then the bladder can expand and contract in volume, but the bladder lacks structural support and is difficult to manipulate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of handlingVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The bladder is divided into flexible wall portions and rigid structural portions, with each serving distinct functions. The flexible portions allow volume change while the rigid portions provide structural support and improve handleability, resolving the contradiction between flexibility and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bladder combines flexible materials (for volume expansion/contraction) with rigid materials (for structural support). This composite construction allows the bladder to simultaneously achieve ease of operation through flexibility and structural strength through rigidity, directly resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Shape

If rigid structural portions are added to provide stiffness and shape, then handling and shape maintenance improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebladder shapeVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Rigid structural portions are strategically placed only where needed for shape definition and handling (such as at the top and bottom portions), while the majority of the bladder body remains flexible. This localized approach maintains shape without unnecessarily increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid structural portions serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide structural support, define the bladder shape, improve handleability, and can incorporate features like inlet ports, outlet ports, and attachment points. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11134768B2Hydration bladders
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 TSI MFG
  • US11134768B2 patent drawing
  • US11134768B2 patent drawing
  • US11134768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are embodiments of hydration bladders that include flexible wall portions along with relatively more rigid structural portions that are shaped to help define the shape of the bladder and can also help a user grip and manipulate the bladder. The structural portions can also support or incorporate other bladder features, such as inlet ports, caps, outlet ports, valves, tubes, attachment points, graphic designs, and/or other features. Some embodiments include an outlet tube that is retractable and extendable through an upper port at the top of the bladder.