Hydrator Vertical Tube Fluid Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydration processes for food products, such as dough and batter production, often require mechanical mixing which can lead to inefficient energy use, uneven product distribution, and increased equipment costs, as well as heating issues.

Innovation Solution

A hydrator system that combines wet and dry ingredients without mechanical stirring, using a vertically oriented tube with rotating fan and dry blades to aerate and break down dry ingredients before adding low-pressure liquid through a nozzle, creating a uniform product without mechanical kneading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If mechanical mixing and kneading are used to combine wet and dry ingredients, then the ingredients are thoroughly mixed, but energy consumption increases and heating issues occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of doughVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical mixing and kneading systems with a fluid dynamic system. Liquid is injected at high velocity through nozzles to create intense turbulence and shear forces that mix dry ingredients without mechanical contact. This substitution eliminates the need for motors, shafts, and mixing blades, dramatically reducing energy consumption while achieving uniform dough composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses hydraulic injection of liquid at controlled pressures (typically 5-50 bar) to achieve mixing. The liquid stream creates a fluidized bed effect and turbulent flow patterns that thoroughly combine ingredients. This hydraulic approach replaces traditional mechanical power transmission systems, reducing both energy consumption and equipment complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Productivity

If high-pressure liquid spraying is used for hydration, then mixing efficiency improves, but equipment complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing chamber is segmented into distinct zones: a fluidization zone where liquid first contacts dry ingredients, a mixing zone where turbulence completes incorporation, and a discharge zone. Multiple nozzles are strategically positioned to create sequential mixing stages. This segmentation allows efficient mixing at moderate pressures while simplifying equipment design compared to single-stage high-pressure systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic flow patterns created by injected liquid to achieve mixing. The liquid stream velocity, flow rate, and injection angle are optimized to create natural turbulence and eddy currents that enhance mixing efficiency. This dynamic approach replaces static high-pressure mechanisms, reducing equipment complexity while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If mechanical mixing is used to combine ingredients, then hydration is achieved, but temperature control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydration uniformityVSAvoidtemperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

By replacing mechanical mixing with fluid injection, the system eliminates the friction and shear heating inherent in mechanical systems. The liquid stream performs mixing through pressure-driven flow and turbulence rather than mechanical friction, maintaining lower temperatures throughout the process. This substitution directly addresses temperature control while achieving uniform hydration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple mixing stages are used to ensure uniform product, then product quality improves, but equipment size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct uniformityVSAvoidequipment size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates multiple mixing stages within a compact vertical chamber by varying nozzle positions, angles, and injection points. The fluid flow transitions through different regimes (jet, turbulence, eddy currents) as it moves vertically through the chamber, providing sequential mixing action without requiring large horizontal space. This vertical dimensionality allows multi-stage mixing in a compact footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple nozzle assemblies are nested within the mixing chamber, with nozzles positioned at different heights and angles. The liquid flow from upper nozzles interacts with material already disturbed by lower nozzles, creating nested mixing zones. This nesting approach provides multiple mixing stages within a single compact chamber, reducing overall equipment size while maintaining product uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a more uniform product with reduced energy consumption, smaller equipment, better temperature control, and lower production costs, while avoiding mechanical mixing and kneading.

Implementation Method 1

The liquid stream creates turbulence and shear forces to mix dry ingredients without mechanical contact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

The liquid stream creates turbulence and shear forces to mix dry ingredients without mechanical contact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Data Source

PatentUS10736328B2Hydrator
Publication Date: 2020.08.11 READING BAKERY SYST
  • US10736328B2 patent drawing
  • US10736328B2 patent drawing
  • US10736328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hydrator includes a dry module with a vertically oriented tube having a central axis, an interior, an upper inlet aperture, a lower outlet, and an inlet section including a dry inlet. A mixing segment includes a vertically oriented tube having an interior wall, a mixing-segment inlet at an upper end, and a mixing-segment outlet at a lower end. The mixing segment is vertically aligned with and sealingly connected to the outlet of the dry module. A rotating hydrator shaft has a liquid channel and a longitudinal axis aligned with the central axis of the dry module. Dry blades are disposed on and rotate with the hydrator shaft in the mixing segment. A hydrator nozzle is disposed on and rotates with the hydrator shaft and has a plurality of outlets in fluid communication with the liquid channel and open to the mixing segment for discharging liquid from the liquid channel.