Hydraulic Actuator Velocity Control for Precise Work Machine Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing work machines face delays in the response of hydraulic actuators to velocity commands, leading to inaccurate control of work implements, particularly in operations requiring precise velocity control like horizontal excavation.

Innovation Solution

A work machine with a controller that computes velocity commands based on actual hydraulic actuator velocities and past command histories, using posture sensor data to minimize delays and ensure accurate actuator control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If velocity commands are issued to hydraulic actuators based on posture sensor data, then manufacturing precision of work implement actions is improved, but response speed deteriorates due to delays in actuator velocity response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracy of work implementVSAvoidresponse speed of actuator velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The controller predicts future actuator velocities based on current velocity commands and system characteristics before actually issuing new velocity commands. This preliminary prediction allows the control system to compensate for the inherent delays in hydraulic actuator response, ensuring that the predicted velocity matches the target velocity calculated from posture sensor data, thereby maintaining both accuracy and responsiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual actuator velocities and uses this feedback information to refine velocity command predictions. By comparing predicted velocities with actual velocities and adjusting subsequent commands accordingly, the system compensates for response delays and maintains precise control of the work implement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the control system waits for actual actuator velocity to match commanded velocity before issuing new commands, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to control delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevelocity control accuracyVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of waiting for actuator velocity to actually change, the controller performs preliminary predictions of what the velocity will be and issues compensated velocity commands in advance. This eliminates the need to wait for velocity matching while still ensuring accurate control, thereby maintaining both precision and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the traditional mechanical waiting approach (where the controller would wait for velocity to match before proceeding) with a computational prediction approach. By using mathematical models to predict future velocities and pre-compensating commands, the system achieves the same control accuracy without the time delay, thus maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If the controller uses operation device input for velocity computation during start of movement, then response speed is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to velocity computation inaccuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed at movement startVSAvoidvelocity control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The controller predicts the actual actuator velocity that will result from operation device input before the movement fully commences. By pre-computing the expected velocity based on system characteristics and operation input, the controller can issue accurate velocity commands from the start of movement, achieving both fast response and high precision without relying solely on posture sensor data which has inherent delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12428816B2Work machine
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO LTD
  • US12428816B2 patent drawing
  • US12428816B2 patent drawing
  • US12428816B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A work machine includes hydraulic actuators that drive a work implement, and a controller configured to output a control signal for controlling each hydraulic actuator on the basis of a velocity command to each actuator computed at each computation cycle. When controlling an action of a first hydraulic actuator under a predetermined condition according to an action of a second hydraulic actuator, the controller computes a velocity command to the first hydraulic actuator at a current computation cycle, with use of an actual velocity of each hydraulic actuator at the current computation cycle computed on the basis of a sensing signal of a posture sensor and a history of past velocity commands to each hydraulic actuator computed at previous computation cycles before the current computation cycle, and outputs a control signal according to the velocity command to the first hydraulic actuator at the current computation cycle.