Hydraulic Control Valve Selection Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydraulic control systems require significant energy to maintain high inlet pressures for load management, especially when transitioning from negative to positive loads, and often necessitate system pressure changes to switch between pressure control and flow control modes, which is energetically unfavourable and operationally cumbersome.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic control system that uses a selection device to optionally supply either pressure control or flow control pressure to the compensation valve, allowing for automatic switching between operation modes based on pressure conditions, thereby optimizing energy consumption and simplifying operation by maintaining a set position for the actuating element.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If the control valve is opened relatively much to generate high inlet pressure for lowering the motor under load, then the required pressure is achieved, but the energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinlet pressureVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the control parameter from pressure-based control to flow-based control. By controlling the flow rate through the control valve rather than maintaining high pressure, the system achieves the same motor lowering function with significantly reduced energy consumption. The compensation valve is replaced by a flow control device that directly regulates the flow rate to the motor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system pressure is changed to switch between pressure control and flow control modes, then the operation mode is switched, but the system requires manual intervention and pressure changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation mode switchingVSAvoidmanual intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically selecting the appropriate control mode based on the operating conditions. The control device monitors the system state and autonomously switches between pressure control and flow control modes without requiring manual intervention. This is achieved through integrated sensing and control logic that adapts the control strategy to the current operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stress or pressure

If a slide movement is required to control high pressure in the control valve, then the pressure control is achieved, but the actuating element requires significant movement which is energetically unfavourable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidenergetic unfavourability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the mechanical pressure control system with a flow control system. Instead of using a large slide movement in a pressure control valve to generate high pressure, the system uses a flow control device that directly regulates the flow rate to the motor. This substitution eliminates the need for large mechanical movements and the associated energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient energy use by automatically selecting the most favourable pressure mode, reducing the need for manual system alterations and minimizing energy expenditure, especially during load transitions, while ensuring the consumer receives only the necessary pressure for operation.

Implementation Method 1

In the opening direction, the compensation valve is acted upon by a spring and a pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The fixed throttle is part of a pressure divider between the outlet of the compensation valve and the low-pressure connection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrottle pressure drop: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 3

under the influence of a spring, the load-retaining valve adjusts so that it does not open until the pressure difference has overcome the spring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS7353744B2Hydraulic control
Publication Date: 2008.04.08 DANFOSS POWER SOLUTIONS APS
  • US7353744B2 patent drawing
  • US7353744B2 patent drawing
  • US7353744B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns a hydraulic control (1) with a supply connection arrangement (7) having a high-pressure connection (P) and a low-pressure connection (T), a working connection arrangement having two working connections (A, B) connectable with a consumer, a control valve (8) with a valve element (9) between the supply connection arrangement and the working connection arrangement and a compensation valve (11), which is located between the high-pressure connection (P) and the control valve (8) and is acted upon in the closing direction by a pressure between the compensation valve (11) and the control valve (8).It is endeavoured to ensure the most favourable energy consumption possible.For this purpose, in the opening direction the compensation valve (11) is acted upon by a pressure of a selection device (29, 30, 30′, 38), which optionally supplies the compensation valve (11) with a pressure control pressure or a flow control pressure.