Hydraulic Engine Braking Lash Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine braking systems lack efficient mechanisms to dynamically switch between power and engine brake modes, leading to suboptimal performance and wear due to reliance on mechanical stops and variable lash distances.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulically actuated engine braking system that uses a camshaft, follower, exhaust armature, and lever, with hydraulic actuation of a piston to change lash distance and engage the cam follower, allowing seamless switching between power and engine brake modes by controlling fluid pressure with a solenoid and spring biasing, ensuring optimal valve lift and reduced wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If mechanical stops and variable lash distances are used to switch between power and engine brake modes, then the system structure is simpler, but the switching efficiency is reduced and mechanical wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidswitching efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a hydraulic actuator to dynamically adjust the lash distance between the cam and follower, enabling rapid and precise switching between power mode and engine brake mode. The hydraulic system receives control signals to vary the lash distance, eliminating the need for mechanical stops and achieving efficient mode transitions without increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static mechanical stop-based switching mechanism to a dynamic hydraulic adjustment system. The lash distance becomes a variable parameter that can be continuously adjusted based on operating conditions, allowing the system to optimize performance and reduce wear through adaptive control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If mechanical stops are used to switch between modes, then the device complexity is lower, but mechanical wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching mechanismVSAvoidmechanical wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic actuator replaces mechanical stops as the switching mechanism. By using fluid pressure to adjust the lash distance, the system eliminates direct mechanical contact for mode switching, thereby reducing wear on mechanical components while maintaining relatively simple device architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes a hydraulic control system for the mechanical stop-based switching mechanism. The hydraulic actuator uses fluid pressure rather than mechanical contact to achieve mode transitions, reducing wear on the cam and follower while maintaining acceptable system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If variable lash distances are used for mode switching, then the switching efficiency improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemode switching speedVSAvoidlash distance control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic actuator provides a compact and efficient means of varying the lash distance. The actuator responds to control signals by adjusting the follower's position relative to the cam, enabling rapid mode switching without requiring complex mechanical linkages or multiple adjustment mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system controls the lash distance as a variable parameter that changes with operating conditions. By using hydraulic pressure to adjust this parameter, the system achieves fast switching between power and engine brake modes while keeping the control mechanism relatively simple through centralized hydraulic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves efficient switching between power and engine brake modes, optimizing engine braking power and reducing mechanical wear by automatically adjusting lash distances, eliminating the need for hard mechanical stops and ensuring consistent performance across varying conditions.

Implementation Method 1

Hydraulic actuation of the piston causes a change in lash distance between the cam and the follower

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuation: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

a spring biases the lever. The hydraulically actuated piston overcomes the spring to move the lever

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring biasing: Spring

Implementation Method 3

The camshaft includes at least one cam. The cam has a lobe and a brake bump. The follower engages the cam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS12152515B2Engine braking system
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 DEERE & CO
  • US12152515B2 patent drawing
  • US12152515B2 patent drawing
  • US12152515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine braking system includes a camshaft, a follower, an exhaust armature, a lever, and a hydraulically actuated piston. The camshaft includes at least one cam. The cam has a lobe and a brake bump. The follower engages the cam. The exhaust armature is coupled to the follower. The lever is coupled to the exhaust armature. The hydraulically actuated piston moves the lever. Hydraulic actuation of the piston causes a change in lash distance between the cam and the follower. In an engine brake mode, the follower contacts the cam throughout rotation of the cam.