Hydraulic Iris Break Check Valve for Water Hammer Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Break check valves in fluid distribution systems, such as those used with hydrants, can cause water hammer and pressure spikes due to rapid closure, leading to potential system failure and infrastructure damage.

Innovation Solution

A break check valve with a hydraulic assembly and iris blades that gradually close to mitigate water hammer, featuring a valve member that rotates from an open to a closed position in response to fluid pressure, and a hydraulic device that modulates fluid flow to control closure speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the break check valve closes rapidly to stop fluid flow during dislocation, then the response time is improved, but water hammer and pressure spikes occur causing system damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidwater hammer
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The valve member is designed to rotate dynamically from an open position to a closed position rather than moving linearly. This rotational movement allows the valve to gradually close, reducing water hammer effects while still providing timely response to dislocation events. The hinge coupling enables controlled rotation that balances response speed with pressure management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A hydraulic assembly with a fluid passage is introduced as an intermediary mechanism between the valve member and the closing action. The fluid passage creates hydraulic resistance that slows and controls the closure speed of the valve member, preventing sudden shutdown that causes water hammer while still achieving flow stoppage within an acceptable time frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of substance

If the break check valve closes quickly to prevent fluid loss, then the fluid flow control is improved, but pressure spikes occur causing component failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid lossVSAvoidpressure spike
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The rotational closure mechanism allows the valve to transition gradually from fully open to fully closed, preventing abrupt flow cessation that generates pressure spikes. The dynamic rotation enables controlled fluid flow reduction that stops fluid loss without creating excessive pressure that could damage system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The hydraulic assembly acts as a mediator between the flowing fluid and the valve closure action. By introducing fluid resistance through the fluid passage, the system achieves progressive flow reduction that prevents both fluid loss and pressure spikes, protecting downstream components from damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the valve member rotates to closed position to stop flow, then the flow control function is improved, but water hammer occurs due to rapid closure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control functionVSAvoidwater hammer
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The valve member utilizes rotational movement instead of linear motion to achieve flow control. This rotational mechanism, coupled with the hinge coupling, enables the valve to close gradually while maintaining effective flow control functionality. The dynamic rotation prevents sudden flow cessation that generates water hammer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The fluid passage in the hydraulic assembly serves as an intermediary that modulates the closure process. It creates hydraulic resistance that slows the rotational movement of the valve member, ensuring that flow control is achieved without generating water hammer from rapid closure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces water hammer and pressure spikes by gradually closing, thereby protecting the system from damage and maintaining fluid flow integrity during dislocation events.

Implementation Method 1

such valves can result in water hammer if they close too quickly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater hammer: Fluid Hammer

Implementation Method 2

an axis of the fluid passage at the outlet can intersect the at least one valve member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS20260055842A1Break check valve
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 MUELLER INT LLC
  • US20260055842A1 patent drawing
  • US20260055842A1 patent drawing
  • US20260055842A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A break check valve can include one or more rotating members configured to rotate to alter the break check valve from an open position to a closed position upon dislocation of a pipe system fitting, the break check valve being altered from an open position to a closed position when acted upon by fluid within a piping system.