Integrated Flow Control Valve for Hydraulic Motor Cavitation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydraulic motors operating under varying loads face insufficient hydraulic fluid flow, leading to potential cavitation damage and inefficiencies, particularly when actuated to stop position.

Innovation Solution

A flow control valve integrated into the motor block, capable of maintaining constant hydraulic flow by adjusting its throughflow area based on pressure differences, is positioned downstream of the motor to manage load variations and prevent cavitation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional hydraulic system is used without flow control, then the system structure is simple, but the hydraulic liquid flow becomes insufficient under varying loads, leading to cavitation damage and motor performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor performance reliabilityVSAvoidhydraulic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control valve is integrated directly into the motor block, merging two separate components (motor and flow control valve) into a single unified structure. This eliminates the need for separate external flow control components and complex piping, while ensuring sufficient hydraulic liquid flow to the motor under varying loads to prevent cavitation damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

A flow control valve is introduced as an intermediary component between the hydraulic pump and the motor. This valve mediates the hydraulic flow, adjusting and maintaining sufficient liquid flow to the motor under varying load conditions, thereby preventing cavitation while maintaining a relatively simple overall system structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the motor is actuated to stop position in a conventional system, then the stopping function is achieved, but cavitation damage occurs due to insufficient hydraulic liquid flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor stopping capabilityVSAvoidcavitation damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control valve is positioned downstream of the motor and is actuated in advance of the motor stopping action. By closing the flow control valve before the motor reaches the stop position, sufficient hydraulic liquid flow is maintained to the motor during the stopping process, preventing cavitation damage while achieving the desired stopping function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If hydraulic flow is increased to prevent cavitation, then cavitation damage is reduced, but motor speed control becomes difficult and racing conditions may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavitation preventionVSAvoidmotor speed control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control valve is equipped with a sensor that detects the actual flow rate of hydraulic liquid. This feedback information is used to automatically adjust the valve opening, maintaining optimal flow to the motor. This ensures sufficient flow to prevent cavitation while simultaneously maintaining precise motor speed control and preventing racing conditions through closed-loop control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures consistent motor speed and reduced risk of cavitation and racing by maintaining optimal hydraulic flow and pressure control, even under extreme load changes, enhancing operational efficiency and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

capable of maintaining constant hydraulic flow by adjusting its throughflow area based on pressure differences

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

Another critical situation with a risk of cavitation damage is when the motor is actuated into stop position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Data Source

PatentUS7784391B2Arrangement for controlling a hydraulically driven motor
Publication Date: 2010.08.31 PARKER HANNIFIN AB
  • US7784391B2 patent drawing
  • US7784391B2 patent drawing
  • US7784391B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an arrangement for controlling a hydraulically driven motor, forming part of a hydraulic system in which hydraulic fluid under pressure forms a main flow through a main duct in which the motor is connected. The motor drives a varying load, and one or more valves (7) are adapted for controlling the hydraulic fluid flow through the motor on the one hand during operation and on the other hand for starting and stopping of the motor. One of the valves consists of a flow control valve (7) which is connected in the main duct (1) downstream of the outlet of the motor, and the flow control valve (7) is integrated with the motor housing (50).