Hydraulic Position Control for Consistent Implement Downforce

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional agricultural surface engaging machines face challenges in maintaining consistent surface engagement position and downforce across varying soil conditions due to the limitations of traditional force control systems, which can lead to inconsistent seeding depth and potential actuator malfunctions.

Innovation Solution

A position control system that incorporates a fluid cylinder actuator, proportional control valve, and sensors to precisely adjust the fluid force applied to the surface engaging implement, allowing for real-time adaptation to soil conditions and ensuring accurate surface engagement position maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional downforce methods (springs, weights, airbags) are used, then the system is simple and reliable, but the surface engagement position cannot be maintained consistently under varying soil conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface engagement position consistencyVSAvoidadaptation to varying soil conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static downforce methods (springs, weights) to a dynamic active force control system using a cylinder actuator with fluid pressure control. The cylinder actuator can dynamically adjust the downforce applied to the surface engaging implement based on real-time feedback from force sensors and position sensors, enabling consistent surface engagement position across varying soil conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback control mechanism where force sensors measure the actual downforce applied to the surface, and position sensors monitor the surface engagement position. This feedback is processed by a controller that adjusts the fluid pressure to the cylinder actuator via a proportional control valve, continuously maintaining the desired surface engagement position despite changes in soil conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If force or pressure feedback systems are used to control downforce, then adaptability to soil conditions improves, but the system cannot determine if the mechanism or actuator has malfunctioned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedownforce adjustment capabilityVSAvoidmalfunction detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple feedback sensors including force sensors to measure downforce and position sensors to monitor the surface engagement position. By comparing the expected position (calculated from applied downforce) with the actual measured position, the system can detect malfunctions in the cylinder actuator or other components, enhancing reliability while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If faster travel speeds are used, then productivity increases, but maintaining constant surface engagement position becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel speedVSAvoidsurface engagement position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The active force control system with cylinder actuator responds dynamically to changes in soil conditions that occur at higher travel speeds. The fast-responding fluid pressure control system adjusts downforce in real-time, maintaining stable surface engagement position even when the implement encounters varying soil types and moisture conditions at increased travel speeds, thus supporting higher productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively maintains consistent surface engagement position and downforce across different soil conditions, enhancing the precision and reliability of agricultural operations by using feedback from position and force sensors to adjust the fluid force applied to the implement.

Implementation Method 1

a chamber within the cylinder configured to receive fluid to apply a fluid force on the piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS20230337564A1Position Control System for Surface Engaging Machinery
Publication Date: 2023.10.26 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP
  • US20230337564A1 patent drawing
  • US20230337564A1 patent drawing
  • US20230337564A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example control system includes a cylinder actuator comprising a cylinder, a piston movable within the cylinder and configured to be coupled to a surface engaging implement, and a chamber within the cylinder configured to receive fluid to apply a fluid force on the piston; a proportional control valve configured to control fluid flow from a source of fluid to the chamber; a position sensor coupled to the cylinder actuator and configured to provide position sensor information indicative of a position of the piston; and a controller having access to a desired surface engagement position for the surface engaging implement, wherein the controller is configured to receive the position sensor information, and send a valve command signal to the proportional control valve to change the fluid force applied to the piston to achieve the desired surface engagement position.