Hydraulic Pressing Device Return Valve Electronic Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydraulic pressing devices rely on structurally determined return valve responses, limiting flexibility in achieving a predetermined pressing force, as the response pressure is fixed by the valve's design parameters.

Innovation Solution

The return valve is coupled to a shaft that rotates counter to its drive direction to actuate the delivery unit for the pressure medium, with an electronic control and monitoring unit generating control signals based on motor drive power or pressure values to trigger the return valve, allowing independent response to a predetermined pressing force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the return valve is designed with fixed structural parameters, then the response pressure is determined, but the flexibility to achieve predetermined pressing force is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in achieving predetermined pressing forceVSAvoidstructural design of return valve
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanically-determined return valve response with an electronically-controlled system. The electronic control unit monitors pressing force via measuring devices and triggers the return valve through electrical control signals, eliminating the need for complex structural adjustments in the return valve itself to achieve different pressing forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing the predetermined pressing force by modifying electrical parameters (control signal thresholds, measuring device sensitivity) rather than changing the physical structure of the return valve. This enables flexible adjustment of pressing force while keeping the return valve structure simple and standardized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If manual return to starting position is required, then simplicity is maintained, but ease of operation and functional reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic return to starting positionVSAvoidreturn mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automatic return to the starting position through the electronic control unit that autonomously detects when the predetermined pressing force is achieved and automatically triggers the return valve. This eliminates the need for manual intervention while keeping the mechanical return mechanism simple, as the automation is handled through existing electrical control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If pressure relief valve is used to limit maximum pressure, then safety is improved, but productivity decreases due to manual return requirement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressing force controlVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses measuring devices to continuously monitor the pressing force and provides feedback to the electronic control unit. When the predetermined pressing force is reached, the control unit automatically triggers the return valve, creating a closed-loop control system that ensures both safety (correct pressing force) and productivity (automatic cycle completion without manual intervention).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances flexibility by enabling the return valve to be triggered in various ways, ensuring consistent and effective application of the predetermined pressing force, such as 32 kN, across different operational conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a pressing tool which is activated by pressure in a piston-cylinder unit containing a hydraulic medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure transmission: Pascal's Law

Implementation Method 2

the moving part being able to be moved back into an initial position by means of a return spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic potential energy: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2014419B1Hydraulic pressing device, in particular for binding workpieces
Publication Date: 2012.09.12 JOINERS BENCH
  • EP2014419B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2014419B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2014419B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The device has a pressing tool moved from a rest position against force of a return spring into an operating position by pressure in a piston cylinder unit containing a hydraulic medium. The pressing tool is moved back into the rest position under the effect of the spring based on activation of a return valve (9) for the hydraulic medium. The return valve is coupled with a shaft in such a manner that the activation of the return valve takes place by a rotation of the shaft against its drive direction for operating a conveying unit for the pressure medium.