Hydraulic Pump Staging for Variable Flow and Lower Component Wear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dynamic testing systems face challenges in efficiently generating hydraulic fluid flows that meet rapidly changing demands, while also reducing energy spikes and wear on pump components.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a hydraulic power unit with a plurality of hydraulic pumps, where unique subsets of pumps are selected based on test flow profiles to produce a variable main flow that exceeds hydraulic fluid flow demand estimates, optimizing energy efficiency and reducing wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional hydraulic power units use multiple passive valve hydraulic pumps with variable displacements, then the system can meet hydraulic fluid flow demands, but energy spikes occur and wear and tear on pump components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidwear and tear on pump components
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the pump fleet into multiple subsets and selectively activates only the necessary number of pumps based on real-time flow demand. This segmentation prevents all pumps from operating simultaneously at partial load, reducing energy spikes and mechanical stress on individual pump components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the configuration of active pump subsets in response to changing flow demands. By continuously optimizing which pumps are active and their displacement settings, the system adapts to varying operational conditions, avoiding the energy inefficiencies and wear associated with static pump configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the system activates all hydraulic pumps to ensure sufficient flow capacity, then flow demand can be met, but energy consumption increases and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic fluid flow generationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system activates only the minimum necessary subset of pumps required to meet the current flow demand, rather than running all pumps. This partial action approach ensures sufficient productivity while avoiding the energy waste of operating excess pumps at low load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by adjusting the displacement settings of active pumps and selecting different pump subsets based on flow demand. This allows the system to maintain high productivity when needed while optimizing energy consumption by matching pump output parameters to actual demand levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system uses a fixed configuration of hydraulic pumps, then system complexity is reduced, but the system cannot efficiently respond to rapidly changing flow demands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to changing flow demandsVSAvoidpump control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes multiple pump subsets and their corresponding flow capacity characteristics. This preliminary configuration allows the control system to quickly select appropriate subsets in response to changing demands without requiring complex real-time optimization calculations, thus maintaining adaptability while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If the system operates pumps at high displacement settings, then flow capacity is maximized, but energy consumption increases and pump component wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow capacityVSAvoidenergy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the pump fleet into subsets and activating only the necessary number of pumps, the system maximizes flow capacity through coordinated operation of fewer pumps rather than operating all pumps at high displacement. This reduces energy loss and mechanical wear compared to high-displacement operation of all pumps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4509713A1Hydraulic power generation pump control
Publication Date: 2025.02.19 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP4509713A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4509713A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4509713A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A hydraulic power unit includes a reservoir containing hydraulic fluid, a main output, a pressure sensor, at least one active valve hydraulic pump and at least one passive valve hydraulic pump. A main flow of the hydraulic fluid is discharged through the main output. The pressure sensor includes a pressure signal that is indicative of a pressure of the main flow. Each active valve hydraulic pump is configured to drive a first flow portion of the main flow from the reservoir to the main output when the pressure signal is below a first pressure setpoint. Each passive valve hydraulic pump is configured to drive a second flow portion of the main flow from the reservoir to the main output when the pressure signal is below a second pressure setpoint.