Closed-loop Hydraulic Regeneration via Load-holding Valves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Closed-loop hydraulic systems for heavy equipment, such as excavators and dozers, have historically been less efficient in regeneration compared to open-loop systems due to pressure limitations from charge relief valves, leading to increased complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic system with a variable displacement pump, load-holding valves, and a regeneration valve, controlled by a controller to manage fluid flow between passages, allowing selective connection and blocking to optimize regeneration efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a closed-loop hydraulic system uses charge relief valves to limit pressure, then system safety is improved, but regeneration efficiency deteriorates due to pressure limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoidregeneration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the hydraulic circuit into separate head-end and rod-end passages with independent load-holding valves, allowing regeneration to occur without being constrained by charge relief valve pressure limits. This segmentation enables the rod-end chamber to pressurize independently during regeneration, improving efficiency while maintaining overall system safety through the load-holding valves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Load-holding valves are introduced as intermediary components between the pump and the actuator chambers. These valves act as mediators that can maintain high pressure during regeneration without requiring the entire system to operate at elevated pressure levels, thus resolving the contradiction between safety and regeneration efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a closed-loop system implements regeneration by directly connecting rod-end and head-end chambers, then regeneration capability is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional valves and control requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregeneration capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The load-holding valves are integrated into the existing closed-loop circuit architecture, merging the regeneration function with the load-holding function. This combination allows the system to achieve regeneration capability without adding separate complex valve assemblies, thereby improving regeneration capability while minimizing the increase in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The load-holding valves serve multiple functions: they maintain pressure during normal operation, enable regeneration by blocking fluid return to the pump, and provide safety protection. This multi-functionality improves regeneration capability while avoiding the need for dedicated regeneration valves that would increase system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Power

If the pump operates at higher pressures in an open-loop system, then power output is improved, but energy loss increases due to pressure drops across relief valves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidenergy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts what would normally be wasted energy (fluid returning to the pump during regeneration) into useful work by directing it to the head-end chamber. The load-holding valves prevent the harmful pressure drop across relief valves by maintaining pressure differential, thus improving power output while reducing energy loss through the regeneration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the pressure parameters in different parts of the circuit. During regeneration, the rod-end chamber operates at high pressure while the head-end chamber receives fluid at lower pressure, optimizing both power output and energy efficiency by avoiding unnecessary high-pressure operation across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances regeneration efficiency, reduces energy loss, and simplifies control, resulting in improved performance and cost-effectiveness by redirecting fluid flow to maximize speed and minimize energy waste.

Implementation Method 1

the pressure of the fluid acts on hydraulic surfaces of the chambers to affect movement of the actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a first load-holding valve disposed within the first passage and movable between a flow-blocking position and a flow-passing position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure containment: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

the regeneration valve may be configured to selectively fluidly connect the first passage with the second passage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow redirection: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9080310B2Closed-loop hydraulic system having regeneration configuration
Publication Date: 2015.07.14 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US9080310B2 patent drawing
  • US9080310B2 patent drawing
  • US9080310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hydraulic system is disclosed that has first and second passages connecting a pump to an actuator in closed-loop manner, and first and second load-holding valves within the first and second passages. The hydraulic system may also have a regeneration valve connected to the first and second passages between the actuator and the first and second load-holding valves to selectively connect the first and second passages. The hydraulic system may further have a controller configured to cause a control valve to simultaneous move the first and second load-holding valves toward flow-blocking positions when pump displacement is about zero. The controller may also be configured to selectively cause the regeneration valve to connect the first and second passages when pump displacement is non-zero, and to cause only one of the first and second load-holding valves to move to its flow-blocking position when the regeneration valve connects the first and second passages.