Hydraulic Rotator Vane Sealing and Axial Load Separation

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hydraulic rotators face challenges in achieving precise fit and strength to handle high mechanical demands, leading to difficulties in production and efficiency due to the need for high precision and robustness to prevent motor seizure under axial forces.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic rotator design featuring a rotor with radially extending vanes and a stator with circumferential rims to guide and seal the vanes, allowing for a gap between the rotor and stator, which reduces production costs and internal leakage, and separates axial load bearing from the active interaction, using an axial bearing for load support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If high precision fit is implemented between rotor and stator to minimize internal leakage, then motor efficiency is improved, but manufacturing difficulty and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The interaction between rotor and stator is segmented into two distinct zones: a central active interaction zone with controlled gap for vanes, and peripheral contact zones at the ends for axial force handling. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized independently - the central zone tolerates larger gaps reducing manufacturing precision requirements while the peripheral zones provide precise force transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vanes act as intermediary elements between the rotor and stator. Instead of requiring direct high-precision contact between rotor and stator surfaces, the vanes mediate the interaction by extending from the rotor to engage with the stator's circumferential track, allowing for tolerance compensation while maintaining hydraulic sealing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If high precision fit is implemented between rotor and stator to minimize internal leakage, then motor efficiency is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The interaction between rotor and stator is segmented into two distinct zones: a central active interaction zone with controlled gap for vanes, and peripheral contact zones at the ends for axial force handling. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized independently - the central zone tolerates larger gaps reducing manufacturing precision requirements while the peripheral zones provide precise force transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vanes act as intermediary elements between the rotor and stator. Instead of requiring direct high-precision contact between rotor and stator surfaces, the vanes mediate the interaction by extending from the rotor to engage with the stator's circumferential track, allowing for tolerance compensation while maintaining hydraulic sealing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If rotor and stator are dimensioned to cope with axial forces, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The axial force handling function is extracted from the central active interaction zone and relocated to the peripheral end zones. The circumferential track and vanes are designed to handle radial and tangential forces, while the peripheral contact surfaces between rotor and stator specifically handle axial forces, separating the functions to simplify the overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The interaction between rotor and stator is segmented into two distinct zones: a central active interaction zone with controlled gap for vanes, and peripheral contact zones at the ends for axial force handling. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized independently - the central zone tolerates larger gaps reducing manufacturing precision requirements while the peripheral zones provide precise force transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If vanes are made precise relative to stator chambers to minimize internal leakage, then motor efficiency is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The vanes are designed to be self-adjusting through their interaction with the circumferential track. As the rotor rotates and hydraulic pressure acts on the vanes, they automatically maintain optimal positioning within the track, compensating for manufacturing tolerances. The track geometry guides the vanes into correct angular positioning without requiring extremely tight manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The vane-track interaction is designed to be dynamic rather than static. The vanes can move slightly within the circumferential track in response to hydraulic pressure variations and rotor position, allowing them to self-optimize their sealing contact. This dynamic adjustment capability reduces the need for high initial manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances precision and tolerance to external loads, improves motor efficiency, and reduces production costs by allowing less stringent alignment requirements, while maintaining robustness against axial forces.

Implementation Method 1

Vanes extend from the circumferential protrusion and are in operation driven by a pressure acting in chambers formed in the circumferential track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

A rotator includes a motor, typically a hydraulic vane motor, to provide the rotational movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic motor: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

a track is formed between the first and second circumferential rims, such that a gap exist between the external surface of the rotor and the inner circumferential surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing contact: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3802393B1Hydraulic rotator apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.07.06
  • EP3802393B1 patent drawingFigure 1~1C
  • EP3802393B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3A
  • EP3802393B1 patent drawingFigure 4~7

AI summary

The invention relates to a hydraulic rotator (11) for rotating a tool with respect to a crane arm, the hydraulic rotator comprising a first attachment piece (12) for connection to a crane arm and a second attachment piece (13) for connection to a tool; and a stator (14) and a rotor (15), the rotor (15) being rotatably arranged inside the stator (14) to rotate around an axial axis (A), wherein the rotor (15) comprises vanes (18) that are biased to extend radially outwards from said rotor (15), and wherein the stator (14) comprises an inner circumferential surface (25) to receive said vanes (18), which inner circumferential surface (25) comprises at least two chambers (19a) arranged to receive each vane of said vanes (18) to a first extent, and at least two shallow portions (19b) arranged to receive each vane of said vanes (18) to a second extent, which is substantially less compared to said first extent, wherein said inner circumferential surface (25) is arranged to receive at least a tip portion of the vanes (18) throughout its whole periphery.