Hydraulic Row Unit Down-Force Control for Planters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural planters face challenges in maintaining consistent seed depth and adjusting down-force pressure across varying soil conditions, residue levels, and obstructions, with existing systems being cumbersome and inefficient in responding to rapid changes, leading to potential damage and uneven planting.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a hydraulic system with a compact hydraulic cylinder and accumulator unit, integrated into a single housing, allows for rapid and adjustable down-force control, enabling each row unit to respond independently to soil conditions without disrupting other units, using a hose connection manifold for fluid circulation and a hydraulic control valve for precise pressure management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional springs are used to urge row units downward, then down force is provided, but the system cannot rapidly adjust to changing soil conditions or obstructions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to soil conditionsVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical springs with a hydraulic system comprising a hydraulic cylinder, accumulator, and control valve. The hydraulic fluid transmits force rapidly and can be precisely controlled to adjust down force levels quickly in response to changing soil conditions, obstructions, or residue levels, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Manufacturing precision

If air bag systems are used to provide down force, then uniform down force is achieved, but the large volume required makes rapid pressure changes cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of down forceVSAvoidtime for pressure adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a hydraulic system instead of pneumatic air bags. Hydraulic fluid is incompressible and can be rapidly pressurized or depressurized through a control valve, enabling quick adjustment of down force levels without the volume-related delays inherent in air bag systems, while maintaining uniform force distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical state and properties of the force transmission medium from compressible gas to incompressible liquid, fundamentally altering the response characteristics. The hydraulic system allows rapid parameter changes in down force through pressure control, eliminating the time delays associated with air bag pressure adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If combination spring/hydraulic shock absorbers are used, then down force control is provided, but force increases when striking obstructions causing component damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability of down forceVSAvoiddamage from obstruction impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a hydraulic system with a control valve that can rapidly modulate down force levels. When an obstruction is detected or encountered, the control valve quickly reduces hydraulic pressure to the cylinder, allowing the row unit to rise over the obstruction without excessive impact forces that would cause component damage, while maintaining ease of operation through hydraulic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Quantity of substance

If a central accumulator is used in hydraulic systems, then hydraulic fluid is supplied, but pressure spikes develop when hitting obstructions at high speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic fluid volumeVSAvoidpressure spikes
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent places a separate accumulator near each hydraulic cylinder rather than using a single central accumulator. This segmentation allows each row unit to independently manage hydraulic fluid volume and absorb pressure variations locally, preventing pressure spikes from propagating through the entire system when one unit encounters an obstruction at high speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each row unit is equipped with its own accumulator, providing localized hydraulic fluid storage and pressure regulation. This local quality ensures that pressure variations and volume changes are contained to individual units, preventing system-wide pressure spikes while maintaining adequate fluid supply for each cylinder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Adaptability or versatility

If individual row units are equipped with hydraulic control, then independent adjustment is possible, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent row unit controlVSAvoidhydraulic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic system is segmented into modular units, with each row unit having its own cylinder and accumulator. This segmentation enables independent control of each row unit while using standardized components that can be replicated across multiple units, managing complexity through modularity and standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hydraulic components (cylinders, accumulators, control valves) are designed as universal, multi-functional elements that can be applied to any row unit in the system. This universality reduces overall system complexity by using standardized parts rather than custom-designed components for each unit, while still enabling independent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables on-the-go adjustments with improved force control, minimizing damage and ensuring uniform seed depth and planting efficiency across diverse terrain, enhancing productivity and yield by allowing each row unit to float independently and adjust down-force quickly.

Implementation Method 1

a hydraulic system with a compact hydraulic cylinder and accumulator unit, integrated into a single housing, allows for rapid and adjustable down-force control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic principle: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

The hose connection manifold is mounted adjacent to the hydraulic actuator for circulating hydraulic fluid between a hydraulic source and the hydraulic actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic accumulator: Hydraulic Accumulator

Data Source

PatentUS9226440B2Agricultural apparatus with hydraulic cylinder and manifold for a row unit
Publication Date: 2016.01.05 DEERE & CO
  • US9226440B2 patent drawing
  • US9226440B2 patent drawing
  • US9226440B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural row unit includes an attachment frame adapted to be rigidly connected to a towing frame, and a linkage assembly pivotably coupled to the attachment frame to permit vertical pivoting movement of the linkage assembly relative to the attachment frame. The row unit further includes a hydraulic actuator coupled to the linkage assembly for urging the linkage assembly downwardly toward the soil, and a hose connection manifold mounted adjacent to the hydraulic actuator for circulating hydraulic fluid between a hydraulic source and the hydraulic actuator. The hose connection manifold has a modular port for accepting, one at a time, a removable control valve and a port plug.