Hydraulic Soft Start System with Integrated Pilot Valve

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydraulic soft start systems are inefficient in using hydraulic fluid, prone to leaks, and complex in plumbing, leading to reduced performance and increased maintenance due to external components and multiple connections, which are affected by temperature fluctuations and limited pressure reserves.

Innovation Solution

An integrated soft start and hydraulic motor assembly with a pilot-operated flow control valve and flow restricting orifices that gradually increase fluid flow to the motor, reducing fluid loss and simplifying plumbing by integrating components within a housing, thus minimizing leaks and external connections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a primary flow control valve is used to gradually open and regulate fluid flow to the hydraulic motor, then the motor can be softly started, but fluid pressure and flow are lost during the throttling process reducing system efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoft start capabilityVSAvoidfluid pressure and flow loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control function is segmented into two distinct stages: a first flow control valve for initial soft start and a second flow control valve for full flow. This segmentation allows the system to transition from restricted flow to full flow more efficiently, reducing the time and energy lost during the throttling process while maintaining the soft start capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate valves and charging components are used, then the system can perform multiple functions, but the number of connections and connectors increases leading to higher failure rate and leakage potential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidleakage and failure rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple separate components (first flow control valve, second flow control valve, charging components) are merged into a single integrated valve assembly with a common housing. This consolidation reduces the number of external connections and connectors, thereby reducing leakage points and potential failure sites while maintaining all necessary system functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If externally plumbed soft start valves are used, then the system can be assembled, but extra hydraulic fittings and hoses are required increasing leakage risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem assemblyVSAvoidleakage potential
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control valves and charging components are integrated into a single valve assembly housing, eliminating the need for external hydraulic fittings and hoses. This integration maintains ease of assembly while dramatically reducing leakage risk by removing external connection points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Quantity of substance

If the system uses limited pressure reserve from a hydraulic accumulator, then the system can operate with limited resources, but fluid is less efficiently used during valve transition reducing cranking cycles available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure reserveVSAvoidcranking cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The two-stage flow control system segments the pressure utilization into efficient stages, allowing the system to maximize the use of limited pressure reserve from the accumulator. By controlling the transition from restricted to full flow more efficiently, the system extracts more useful work from each unit of stored pressure, increasing the number of available cranking cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances fluid efficiency, reduces maintenance, and maintains consistent performance across temperature variations by integrating components and using a two-stage fluid flow approach, allowing for faster cranking speeds and reduced fluid consumption.

Implementation Method 1

A pilot operated flow control valve is located in the valve housing and includes a pilot, a drain, an inlet and an outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPilot-operated valve control: Valve

Implementation Method 2

A first flow restricting orifice is located in the valve housing in fluid communication with and disposed between the pressure source port and the hydraulic motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOrifice flow restriction: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS9360025B2Hydraulic soft start system
Publication Date: 2016.06.07 MARADYNE CORP
  • US9360025B2 patent drawing
  • US9360025B2 patent drawing
  • US9360025B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hydraulic soft-start system includes a flow control valve which is in fluid communication with a pressure source and an inlet of a motor. The system includes a first flow restricting orifice and a second flow restricting orifice disposed between a pilot for actuating the flow control valve and the inlet of the motor. A first flow is passed from the pressure source via the first orifice to an inlet of the motor, placing the motor in a partially-actuated state. The flow control valve is actuated after a threshold pressure of the pilot is reached allowing a second flow to pass from the pressure source to the motor inlet. The second flow is higher than the first flow, thereby placing the motor in a fully-actuated state.