Hydraulic Pump and Valve Control for Low-Loss Combined Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hydraulic systems in construction machines face inefficiencies due to meter-in loss and unstable pressure control, leading to energy wastage and operator discomfort from sudden flow rate changes, especially when transitioning between combined and single operations.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic drive system with a variable displacement pump, directional control valves, and an unloading valve controlled by a sophisticated controller that computes and adjusts flow rates and pressures to minimize meter-in loss and stabilize flow dividing control, even at low differential pressures, thereby preventing energy wastage and operator shocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the meter-in opening area of the directional control valve is increased to reduce meter-in loss, then energy efficiency is improved, but the differential pressure becomes zero causing unstable pressure control and hunting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeter-in lossVSAvoidpressure control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A differential pressure generating valve is introduced as an intermediary component between the hydraulic pump and the directional control valve. This valve artificially generates the necessary differential pressure by creating a controlled pressure drop, allowing the meter-in opening to remain large for energy efficiency while maintaining stable pressure control through the mediator's pressure regulation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If the differential pressure is reduced to improve energy efficiency, then meter-in loss decreases, but flow dividing control becomes unstable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeter-in lossVSAvoidflow dividing control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback control where a differential pressure detecting valve monitors the actual differential pressure and feeds this information back to the differential pressure generating valve. This feedback mechanism ensures that the differential pressure is maintained at the optimal level for both energy efficiency and stable flow dividing control, automatically adjusting to maintain reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If the meter-in opening is enlarged to reduce pressure loss, then energy efficiency improves, but the system can no longer maintain the required differential pressure for control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure lossVSAvoiddifferential pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure control function is segmented from the flow control function. The differential pressure generating valve handles pressure control by creating a controlled pressure drop, while the directional control valve focuses on flow direction and distribution with its enlarged meter-in opening. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its function without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If the throttle orifice is fully opened to eliminate meter-in loss, then energy efficiency increases, but sudden flow rate changes cause operator discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeter-in lossVSAvoidoperator discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The differential pressure generating valve performs preliminary anti-action by maintaining a controlled differential pressure that prevents sudden flow rate changes. This pre-established pressure differential acts as a buffer that smooths out flow transitions, counteracting the potential for sudden changes before they can affect the actuator and cause operator discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves stable flow dividing control and high energy efficiency by setting the unloading valve pressure based on meter-in pressure loss, allowing for large meter-in openings and reducing energy wastage and operator discomfort during flow rate changes.

Implementation Method 1

an unloading valve that discharges the hydraulic fluid in a hydraulic fluid supply line of the hydraulic pump to a tank when a pressure in the hydraulic fluid supply line of the hydraulic pump exceeds a set pressure determined by adding at least a target differential pressure to a highest load pressure of the plurality of actuators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

a hydraulic drive system comprising: a variable displacement hydraulic pump; a plurality of actuators driven by a hydraulic fluid delivered from the hydraulic pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic drive: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentEP3660330B1Construction machine
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY TIERRA CO LTD
  • EP3660330B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3660330B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3660330B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Flow control over a hydraulic pump and flow dividing control of a plurality of directional control valves associated with actuators can stably be exercised even in a case in which differential pressures across the directional control valves are quite low, an abrupt change in a flow rate of the hydraulic fluid supplied to each actuator is prevented and excellent combined operability is realized even in an abrupt change in a demanded flow rate at a time of transition from a combined operation to a sole operation, and realizing excellent combined operability, and a meter-in loss in each directional control valve is reduced to realize high energy efficiency. Demanded flow rates of the directional control valves are calculated from input amounts of operation levers, openings of flow control valves are controlled using the demanded flow rates, a meter-in pressure loss of a predetermined directional control valve is calculated from the demanded flow rates and meter-in opening areas of the directional control valves, and a set pressure of an unloading valve is controlled using a value of the meter-in pressure loss.