Hydraulic Control Valve Spool Mechanism for Flow Surge Prevention

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydraulic control valves face challenges in regulating pressure and flow from a load-sensing source, leading to flow surges and inadequate actuator control due to fluctuations in demand and supply, particularly when multiple control sections are actuated simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic control valve with a spool mechanism that shifts between positions to maintain a constant pressure differential, utilizing a spring bias and pilot valve to manage fluid communication between inlet, outlet, and signal cavities, ensuring stable flow and pressure regulation, and incorporating a safety disable mode to prevent undesirable actuator motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a load-sensing source provides flow to multiple control sections, then the system can support multiple actuators, but flow surges occur when demand suddenly decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The valve spool is positioned in advance to block the load-sense passage before flow demand decreases. This preliminary action prevents the pressure buildup that would otherwise cause flow surges when actuators return to neutral position, while still allowing multiple actuators to operate simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The valve spool acts as an intermediary between the load-sensing source and the control sections. By selectively blocking or opening the load-sense passage, the spool mediates the flow and pressure distribution to multiple actuators, preventing flow surges while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the spool blocks the load-sense passage to prevent flow surges, then flow surge is prevented, but the valve actuator cannot be actuated

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The valve spool dynamically transitions between two positions: blocked position for flow surge prevention and open position for valve actuation. This dynamic behavior allows the system to adapt to different operational requirements, preventing flow surges during normal operation while enabling actuator control when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring mechanism applies a preliminary force to counteract the pressure buildup in the signal cavity. This preliminary anti-action prevents the pressure from blocking the load-sense passage during actuation, ensuring that the valve can be operated even when flow surge prevention is active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If the spring force is increased to ensure spool returns to blocked position, then flow surge prevention is improved, but the valve actuator requires higher activation pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The solution introduces a temporal dimension to the force balance by using a timed pressure buildup in the signal cavity. The pressure has time to build up and overcome the spring force during actuation, then the spool automatically returns to the blocked position when actuation ends. This resolves the contradiction by separating the actuation phase from the return phase in time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively regulates pressure and flow, preventing flow surges and ensuring consistent actuator control by maintaining a constant pressure differential and providing a safety disable mode to prevent unwanted motion during power loss or system failures.

Implementation Method 1

the valve body defines a spring cavity adjacent the first end of the spool to house a spring configured to bias the spool to the first position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the first end is subjected to a load-sense pressure signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

the spool is axially movable in the bore to shift between a first position, an intermediate position, and a second position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow control: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS10281934B2Hydraulic control valve with controlled flow and valve safety disable
Publication Date: 2019.05.07
  • US10281934B2 patent drawing
  • US10281934B2 patent drawing
  • US10281934B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example valve includes: a valve body defining a bore, an inlet port, an outlet port, and a signal cavity; a spool movable in the bore to shift between a first position and an intermediate position, where the spool has a first end and a second end, where the outlet port is fluidly connected to the second end, where the valve body defines a spring cavity adjacent the first end of the spool to house a spring, where the first end is subjected to a load-sense pressure signal, and where when the spool is in the first position, the spool disconnects the inlet port from the outlet port and connects the inlet port to the signal cavity; and a valve actuator that, when activated, connects the signal cavity to the second end of the spool to move the spool in the bore from the first position to the intermediate position.