Multi-Stage Hydrocarbon Conversion for Aromatic Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processes for producing aromatic hydrocarbons, such as benzene, face challenges including low yield, catalyst deactivation due to coking, and the need for complex and costly operations, particularly in converting light paraffinic hydrocarbons to aromatic hydrocarbons with reduced byproduct formation.

Innovation Solution

A hydrocarbon conversion process involving three stages, where a feed comprising non-aromatic hydrocarbons is processed with specific catalysts under controlled temperature and pressure conditions to enhance aromatic hydrocarbon yield and reduce catalyst coke formation, utilizing a first stage at lower temperatures and higher pressures, and a second stage at higher temperatures with a different catalyst to optimize aromatic hydrocarbon production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high temperature and low pressure conditions are used for aromatic hydrocarbon production, then aromatic hydrocarbon yield is improved, but catalyst deactivation due to coking increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatic hydrocarbon yieldVSAvoidcatalyst deactivation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The process is divided into multiple reaction stages with different catalysts and conditions. The first stage uses a dehydrogenation catalyst at high temperature to produce aromatic hydrocarbons, while the second stage uses a different catalyst system to further process the product. This segmentation allows optimization of each stage independently, maintaining high yield while managing catalyst deactivation through staged processing rather than single-stage operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operating parameters by using high temperature (400-700°C) and high pressure (1-100 atm) conditions instead of conventional low pressure. This parameter change shifts the reaction equilibrium and kinetic favorability toward aromatic hydrocarbon production, improving yield while the high pressure suppresses catalyst coking by increasing the partial pressure of reactants and products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If feed conversion is increased to improve aromatic hydrocarbon yield, then productivity is improved, but catalyst coking accumulation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatic hydrocarbon yieldVSAvoidcatalyst coking
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful effect of high feed conversion (which causes coking) into a beneficial outcome by using high pressure conditions. The high pressure suppresses the formation of coke by shifting the reaction toward desired aromatic hydrocarbon products and by increasing the rate of hydrogen transfer reactions that prevent coke deposition. Thus, high feed conversion can be maintained without the usual harmful coking effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If conventional single-stage processes are used, then process simplicity is maintained, but aromatic hydrocarbon selectivity and yield are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatic hydrocarbon yieldVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses multiple reaction stages with different catalyst systems. The first stage employs a dehydrogenation catalyst to convert paraffinic hydrocarbons to aromatic hydrocarbons, while the second stage uses a different catalyst to optimize the product distribution and reduce byproducts. This segmentation enables higher overall yield and selectivity by performing different functions in each stage, accepting the trade-off of increased process complexity for significantly improved productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process increases the selectivity for aromatic hydrocarbons and decreases catalyst coke formation, allowing for longer operation cycles without regeneration, and reduces undesirable light hydrocarbon byproducts, improving overall efficiency and yield compared to conventional methods.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the feed with a first catalyst which comprises ≥10 wt. % of a first molecular sieve component and ≥0.005 wt. % of a first dehydrogenation component... contacting at least a portion of the raffinate with a second catalyst which comprises ≥10 wt. % of a second molecular sieve component and ≥0.005 wt. % of a second dehydrogenation component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

a first molecular sieve component and ≥0.005 wt. % of a first dehydrogenation component... a second molecular sieve component and ≥0.005 wt. % of a second dehydrogenation component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS9988325B2Hydrocarbon conversion
Publication Date: 2018.06.05 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US9988325B2 patent drawing
  • US9988325B2 patent drawing
  • US9988325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to the hydrocarbon upgrading to produce aromatic hydrocarbon, to equipment and materials useful in such upgrading, and to the use of such upgrading for, e.g., producing aromatic hydrocarbon natural gas. The upgrading can be carried out in the presence of a dehydrocyclization catalyst comprising at least one dehydrogenation component and at least one molecular sieve.