Hydrocarbon Group-Type Analysis Method for Wide Boiling Range Samples

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for analyzing hydrocarbon samples, particularly those with wide boiling ranges and C13+ hydrocarbons, are limited by conventional PIONA group-type analysis, which struggles to provide detailed and accurate chemical information for heavier fractions and crude oils.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines a representative composition of each portion of the hydrocarbon sample, defined by carbon atoms, alkyl-chain carbon atoms, saturated rings, aromatic rings, and sulfur atoms, and calculates mass fractions of these representative species across multiple portions of the sample.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional PIONA group-type analysis is used, then analysis simplicity is maintained, but analysis scope is limited to C1-C12 hydrocarbons excluding heavier fractions and crude oils

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis scopeVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method segments the hydrocarbon sample into multiple boiling range portions (e.g., C1-C12, C13-C20, C21-C30, C31+) and applies different analytical approaches to each segment. This allows the analysis to be adapted to different hydrocarbon ranges while maintaining systematic organization and interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method extends conventional PIONA analysis by adding a carbon number dimension, creating a two-dimensional classification system (compound family × carbon number range). This enables analysis of heavier fractions beyond C12 while maintaining the chemically meaningful group-type structure of conventional PIONA.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If multiple complementary analytical techniques are combined for wide boiling range samples, then chemical description completeness is improved, but data interpretation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical description completenessVSAvoiddata interpretation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method merges multiple analytical techniques (gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, etc.) into a unified group-type analysis framework. By integrating data from these techniques and organizing results into standardized compound families across carbon number ranges, it provides comprehensive chemical description while maintaining systematic interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The method creates a universal analysis framework that can handle diverse hydrocarbon samples (light fractions, heavy fractions, crude oils) using consistent classification principles. This multi-functional approach allows the same methodology to provide meaningful chemical descriptions across the entire boiling range from C1 to C31+.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If detailed speciation methods are applied, then chemical detail accuracy is improved, but link to overall reactivity becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical detail accuracyVSAvoidreactivity information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies different levels of detail to different compound families based on their reactivity characteristics. For example, it provides detailed speciation for paraffins and naphthenes while grouping certain aromatic compounds by carbon number, optimizing the balance between chemical detail and reactivity relevance for each hydrocarbon class.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The method transforms detailed molecular speciation data into group-type composition parameters (mass fractions of compound families across carbon ranges) that directly relate to reactivity. By changing the representation parameters from individual molecular details to chemically meaningful groups, it maintains accuracy while improving the link to overall reactivity for conversion technology development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250093324A1Group-type analysis of hydrocarbon samples
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US20250093324A1 patent drawing
  • US20250093324A1 patent drawing
  • US20250093324A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to methods for reactivity-based group-type analysis of a hydrocarbon sample. An exemplary method includes determining a representative composition of each of two or more portions of the sample, determining a mass fraction of each of the two or more portions present in the sample, and determining a mass fraction of each representative species present in each of the two or more portions of the sample.