Three-phase hydrocarbon separation via indirect heating and pressure reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for separating hydrocarbon-containing fluids into gas, aqueous, and hydrocarbon liquid phases struggle to meet vapor pressure specifications, leading to inefficient and costly processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a two-stage separation process with indirect heating and pressure reduction, where a first fluid is processed in a first separation zone to enrich the hydrocarbon liquid phase, and then further separated in a second zone after indirect heating and pressure reduction, minimizing the presence of aqueous and gas phases in the final hydrocarbon stream.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If direct heating of hydrocarbon feed is used to achieve better separation of gas, water, and oil phases, then separation efficiency is improved, but meeting vapor pressure specifications becomes difficult and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidvapor pressure specification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The separation process is divided into multiple stages: a first separation zone performs initial separation at higher pressure, followed by a second separation zone that performs final separation at lower pressure. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function, with the second zone controlling vapor pressure specifications more effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes pressure parameters between separation zones - the first zone operates at higher pressure for efficient separation, then pressure is reduced before the second zone which operates at lower pressure to meet vapor pressure specifications. This parameter change enables both separation efficiency and specification compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If conventional single-stage separation systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to meet vapor pressure specifications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation system structureVSAvoidvapor pressure specification
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The separation system is segmented into two distinct zones with different pressure conditions. The first separation zone handles bulk separation at higher pressure, while the second separation zone provides final separation at lower pressure to meet vapor pressure specifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Pressure is reduced between the first and second separation zones, creating different operating parameters for each zone. This parameter change enables the second zone to effectively control vapor pressure specifications while maintaining reasonable system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If heating is applied to improve phase separation, then separation performance is improved, but heat duty requirements and salt deposition increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase separation performanceVSAvoidheat duty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes pressure reduction to induce phase transitions and flash separation in the second separation zone. By reducing pressure from the first zone to the second zone, volatile components flash into the gas phase, improving separation performance without requiring additional heating and reducing heat duty requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces heat duty requirements, minimizes salt deposition, and achieves better control over vapor pressure specifications, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective separation process with improved product quality.

Implementation Method 1

separating a first portion of the gas and a first portion of the aqueous liquid from the first fluid in the first separation zone to produce a second fluid having a higher concentration of hydrocarbon liquid than the first fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity separation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

indirectly heating the second fluid to a second temperature greater than the first temperature but below the saturation temperature of the aqueous liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIndirect heating: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

reducing the pressure of the second fluid to a second pressure below the first pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction: Depressurisation

Implementation Method 4

separating a second portion of the gas and a second portion of the aqueous liquid from the second fluid in a second separation zone to produce a third fluid having a higher concentration of hydrocarbon liquids than the second fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity separation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10301554B2Three-phase separation of hydrocarbon containing fluids
Publication Date: 2019.05.28 JOHN ZINK CO LLC
  • US10301554B2 patent drawing
  • US10301554B2 patent drawing
  • US10301554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The methods improve the separation of hydrocarbon containing fluids. More particularly, the disclosure is relevant to separating fluids having a gas phase and a hydrocarbon liquid phase using indirect heating. In general, the methods use a first gas separation step followed by indirect heating and then a second gas separation step. Pressure reduction of the hydrocarbon containing fluid occurs either before or after the indirect heating.