Hydrocracking Reactor Segmentation for Heavy Metal Deposit Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The petroleum industry faces challenges in processing heavy oil feeds due to high concentrations of heavy metals like nickel and vanadium, which lead to deposition in equipment, reducing reaction volume and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A process involving multiple contacting and separation zones, where a hydrogen-containing gas, heavy oil feedstock, and slurry catalyst are combined under hydrocracking conditions, with the use of water or steam injection to control heavy metal deposits, and recycling of non-volatile streams to reduce catalyst overload and deposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If heavy oil feedstock is processed using conventional hydrocracking methods, then upgraded products are produced, but heavy metal deposits accumulate in equipment reducing reaction volume and run time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction of upgraded productsVSAvoidreactor run time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple contacting zones (first contacting zone, second contacting zone, etc.) with different temperature profiles. The first zone operates at lower temperature to minimize heavy metal deposition, while subsequent zones operate at progressively higher temperatures to maintain conversion efficiency. This segmentation allows the system to achieve both reduced deposition and sustained productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a temperature gradient across different contacting zones, with the first zone operating at a lower temperature than subsequent zones. This parameter change in temperature distribution allows the system to reduce heavy metal deposition in the front-end zone while maintaining effective hydrocracking in downstream zones, thereby extending reactor run time without sacrificing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If heavy oil feedstock is processed to achieve high conversion, then more upgraded products are produced, but heavy metal deposition increases reducing available reaction volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion of heavy oil to upgraded productsVSAvoidavailable reaction volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction system is segmented into multiple contacting zones with progressively increasing temperatures. The first zone operates at lower temperature to minimize deposition, preserving reaction volume, while subsequent zones operate at higher temperatures to drive conversion. This segmentation allows the system to maintain both high conversion and adequate reaction volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different temperature conditions are applied to different zones within the reactor. The first contacting zone has a lower temperature profile optimized for minimizing heavy metal deposition, while subsequent zones have higher temperature profiles optimized for conversion. This local quality differentiation allows simultaneous achievement of high conversion and preserved reaction volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If slurry catalyst is used for hydrocracking, then conversion efficiency is improved, but catalyst overload and deposition occur reducing process performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidprocess performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst is distributed across multiple contacting zones rather than concentrated in a single zone. The first zone receives catalyst at lower temperature, reducing deposition and overload, while subsequent zones receive catalyst at higher temperatures to maintain conversion efficiency. This segmented distribution improves both conversion efficiency and process reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The temperature parameter is varied across different contacting zones to optimize catalyst performance. Lower temperature in the first zone reduces catalyst deposition and overload, while higher temperatures in subsequent zones maintain conversion efficiency. This parameter change strategy enhances both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces heavy metal deposits in equipment, prolongs reactor run time, and maintains reaction efficiency by controlling temperature and catalyst distribution, achieving a significant decrease in solid deposits and maintaining process performance.

Implementation Method 1

combining a hydrogen containing gas feed, a heavy oil feedstock, and a slurry catalyst in a first contacting zone under hydrocracking conditions to convert at least a portion of the heavy oil feedstock to upgraded products

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrocracking:

Implementation Method 2

combining a hydrogen containing gas feed, a heavy oil feedstock, and a slurry catalyst in a first contacting zone under hydrocracking conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 3

water and/or steam is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock and preheated prior to feeding to the first contacting zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPreheating: Heating

Implementation Method 4

water and/or steam is injected into the first contacting zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature control: Cooling

Implementation Method 5

in the separation zone, removing the upgraded products with the hydrogen containing gas as an overhead stream, and removing the slurry catalyst and the unconverted heavy oil feedstock as a non-volatile stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecantation: Sedimentation

Data Source

PatentUS7935243B2Systems and methods for producing a crude product
Publication Date: 2011.05.03 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US7935243B2 patent drawing
  • US7935243B2 patent drawing
  • US7935243B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for hydroprocessing a heavy oil feedstock with reduced heavy oil deposits, the system employs a plurality of contacting zones and separation zones zone under hydrocracking conditions to convert at least a portion of the heavy oil feedstock to lower boiling hydrocarbons, forming upgraded products, wherein the first contacting zone is operated at a temperature of at least 10° F. lower than a next contacting zone. The contacting zones operate under hydrocracking conditions, employing a slurry catalyst for upgrading the heavy oil feedstock, forming upgraded products of lower boiling hydrocarbons. In the separation zones, upgraded products are removed overhead and, optionally, further treated in an in-line hydrotreater. At least a portion of the non-volatile fractions recovered from at least one of the separation zones is recycled back to the first contacting zone in the system.