Hydrocyclone Control for Dense Material Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydrodynamic dense materials separators face challenges in optimizing the flow and pressure of flushing water, leading to inefficient separation and contamination of fractions, particularly due to pressure fluctuations and high water consumption, which disrupt the selective removal of dense materials and impact downstream recycling processes.

Innovation Solution

A control system that regulates the flow and pressure of flushing water in the classifying tube and storage chamber, using sensors and actuators to optimize the flushing water flow based on operational requirements, minimizing water consumption and preventing cementation of dense materials, while ensuring continuous operation and reducing the need for frequent emptying and refilling cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If flushing water flow is increased to prevent cementation of dense materials, then discharge reliability is improved, but water consumption increases and separation quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedischarge reliabilityVSAvoidwater consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by alternating between filling the storage chamber with flushing water and emptying it. The control system activates the flushing water supply only when needed (when dense materials are present in the chamber) and stops it when the chamber is full or empty, preventing continuous water consumption while maintaining discharge reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system uses feedback from sensors (flow sensors, level sensors) to monitor the state of the storage chamber and adjusts the flushing water flow accordingly. When the chamber is full or empty, the system automatically stops flushing water supply, optimizing water usage while preventing cementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Duration of action of moving object

If flushing water flow is increased to maintain continuous operation, then operational continuity is improved, but separation quality deteriorates due to disrupted counter-flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidseparation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic filling and emptying cycles rather than continuous flushing. The control system activates flushing water supply only during specific phases when the storage chamber needs to be filled, and stops it when the chamber is full or empty, maintaining operational continuity while preserving separation quality through uninterrupted counter-flow during critical separation phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the flushing water flow based on real-time conditions. The control system modulates the flow rate and duration of flushing water supply to match the operational needs, ensuring continuous operation when necessary while maintaining separation quality when the chamber is in a stable state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If flushing water is supplied continuously to the classifying tube, then dense materials removal is improved, but water consumption increases and process water is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedense materials removalVSAvoidprocess water consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by supplying flushing water only when the storage chamber needs to be filled with dense materials. The control system activates the flushing water supply during specific cycles and stops it when the chamber is full or empty, preventing continuous water consumption while maintaining effective dense materials removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers and reuses process water by collecting it during the emptying phase and making it available for the next filling phase. This water recovery mechanism reduces overall process water consumption while maintaining the effectiveness of dense materials removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Reliability

If the storage chamber is emptied frequently to prevent cementation, then discharge reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to frequent emptying and refilling cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedischarge reliabilityVSAvoidtime for emptying and refilling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action with optimized timing to empty the storage chamber only when necessary. The control system monitors the state of the chamber and activates emptying only when dense materials have accumulated to a level that would cause cementation, minimizing the frequency of emptying operations while maintaining discharge reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system uses feedback from level sensors and flow sensors to determine when the storage chamber needs to be emptied. By monitoring the actual state of the chamber, the system avoids unnecessary emptying operations and only activates the emptying function when dense materials have accumulated to problematic levels, reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the separation quality of dense materials, reduces contamination, and minimizes flushing water requirements, thereby improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the separation process by maintaining consistent flow and pressure, even with varying process water conditions.

Implementation Method 1

hydrodynamic separation of dense materials removes approx. 3% by weight of the moist mass of the waste being treated as dense materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal separation: Centrifugal Separation

Implementation Method 2

flushing liquid is often delivered to the classifying tube. In this way a counter-flow is generated in the classifying tube which releases the dense materials that have been removed from the other components of the slurry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid counter-flow: Convection

Implementation Method 3

the easily sedimentable portions are often removed from the suspension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSedimentation: Sedimentation

Data Source

PatentUS10173224B2Hydrodynamic removal of dense materials from a slurry
Publication Date: 2019.01.08 BTA INT
  • US10173224B2 patent drawing
  • US10173224B2 patent drawing
  • US10173224B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a device and to a method for the hydrodynamic removal of dense materials from a suspension, said device comprising a hydrocyclone (1), which holds the suspension, a classifying tube (2), which adjoins the hydrocyclone, and a storage chamber (3), which holds the removed dense materials, wherein a flushing water flow to the classifying tube (2) and a flushing water flow to the storage chamber (3) are provided, which can be controlled in a closed-loop or open-loop manner by means of a control element provided at the feed to the classifying tube and a control element provided at the feed to the storage chamber, respectively.