Hydrodynamic Separator with Down Pipes for Stormwater

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydrodynamic separators are ineffective in capturing finer sediments and oils due to limited velocity reduction and flow path maximization, leading to reduced sediment retention and increased maintenance costs due to restricted access for cleaning.

Innovation Solution

A hydrodynamic separator design incorporating a flow splitter to redirect water flow, an oil-floatables skimmer to isolate hydrocarbons, and an outlet weir with down pipes to control velocity and maximize flow path, along with enhanced maintenance access for efficient sediment removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If velocity reduction is increased to improve sediment capture, then finer sediment removal is improved, but flow path length and treatment time are extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesediment removal efficiencyVSAvoidflow path length
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The separator is divided into multiple functional zones: inlet chamber, settling chamber, and outlet chamber, with internal structures like weirs and baffles that segment the flow path to maximize contact time and separation efficiency without excessive length

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces vertical flow components and three-dimensional flow paths within the settling chamber, transitioning from simple horizontal flow to multi-dimensional flow patterns that increase treatment effectiveness without proportionally increasing linear dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If flow path is maximized to improve sediment retention, then treatment efficiency is improved, but device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesediment retention rateVSAvoidseparator size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs curved surfaces and circular flow paths within the settling chamber that allow water to follow a longer, more meandering flow path within a compact footprint, maximizing contact time without proportionally increasing the overall device volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

Internal structures such as weirs, baffles, and flow control elements are nested within the settling chamber, creating multiple flow paths and reflection surfaces that extend the effective treatment path without adding external dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of repair

If access for maintenance is improved to reduce cleaning difficulty, then ease of repair is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance accessVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The separator structure is segmented with removable panels, access doors, and modular components that allow maintenance personnel to access the settling chamber and remove accumulated sediments without dismantling the entire structure, balancing access requirements with structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves greater than 80% removal of total suspended solids and up to 99% retention of free-floating oils, while providing improved access for maintenance, reducing sediment storage capacity issues and maintenance frequency.

Implementation Method 1

a flow splitter to redirect water flow upon entering the sump chamber from the inlet pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow redirection:

Implementation Method 2

an oil-floatables skimmer to isolate hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy separation: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 3

one or more down pipes which siphon water from the lower portion of the sump chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSiphoning: Syphon

Implementation Method 4

an outlet weir with down pipes to control velocity and maximize flow path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow control:

Implementation Method 5

advanced sediment removal devices based on principles of hydrodynamic and gravity separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity separation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS12084850B2Volume controlled hydrodynamic separator for stormwater treatment
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US12084850B2 patent drawing
  • US12084850B2 patent drawing
  • US12084850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and apparatus directed to an innovative approach for the treatment of stormwater utilizing hydrodynamic separator assembly designed to maximize flow movement for more efficient sediment removal and maximize clearance space within assembly to facilitate cleaning and increase storage capacity of trash, debris, and sediment. In particular, the described hydrodynamic separator is an improvement over other hydrodynamic separators known in the art with the inclusion of one or more down pipes which siphon water from the lower portion of the sump chamber. The inclusion of down pipes allows for an improved control of the velocity of the water flow through the device by distributing flow into more than one path.