Aircraft Engine Hydrogen Fuel Metering With Feedback Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional fuel control systems for aircraft engines are designed for liquid fuel and fail to accurately control gaseous fuel flow, particularly hydrogen, due to its compressible nature, leading to instability and inefficiency across varying operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

A fuel control system with a fuel feed conduit, a metering mechanism, position feedback sensor, and a controller that uses multiple sensors (pressure, temperature, and delta pressure sensors) to regulate the fuel flow through a combination of metering and controlled flow valves, ensuring precise control of gaseous hydrogen delivery to achieve desired power outputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional fuel control systems designed for liquid fuel are used, then the system structure is simple, but the control accuracy of gaseous fuel flow deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from liquid fuel control parameters to gaseous fuel control parameters, accounting for compressibility effects. The controller adjusts metering mechanism position based on real-time pressure and temperature measurements, dynamically changing control parameters to maintain accuracy across varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Position feedback sensors provide real-time information about the metering mechanism position to the controller. This closed-loop feedback enables continuous adjustment of the metering mechanism to achieve precise gaseous fuel flow control, directly addressing the accuracy deficiency of traditional open-loop systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If traditional fuel control systems are used, then the device complexity is low, but the stability of gaseous fuel flow control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidfuel flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The position feedback sensor continuously monitors the metering mechanism position and feeds this information back to the controller. This closed-loop control compensates for disturbances and maintains stable gaseous fuel flow delivery despite the compressible nature of the fuel and varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical fuel control mechanisms with an electronically controlled metering mechanism positioned by a torque motor. This substitution enables more precise and stable control of gaseous fuel flow compared to mechanical systems designed for liquid fuel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If a position feedback sensor is added to the fuel metering mechanism, then the control precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition control precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The position feedback sensor provides real-time position information to the controller, enabling closed-loop control of the metering mechanism. This feedback loop significantly improves position control precision, allowing accurate regulation of gaseous fuel flow despite the added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical positioning mechanisms with an electronically controlled torque motor and position feedback sensor combination. This substitution achieves superior control precision while managing overall system complexity through electronic control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If multiple sensors (pressure, temperature, delta pressure) are used, then the control accuracy of gaseous fuel flow is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel flow control accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures and compensates for changes in pressure, temperature, and delta pressure parameters that affect gaseous fuel density and flow characteristics. By incorporating sensors for these parameters, the controller can dynamically adjust control settings to maintain accurate fuel flow delivery despite varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sensors provide comprehensive feedback about the fuel system state to the controller. This multi-parameter feedback enables the controller to compensate for compressibility effects and maintain high control accuracy, justifying the increased sensor system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230036266A1Controlling gaseous fuel flow
Publication Date: 2023.02.02 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US20230036266A1 patent drawing
  • US20230036266A1 patent drawing
  • US20230036266A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fuel control system for an aircraft engine, comprises a fuel feed conduit including an inlet end and an outlet end. A fuel metering mechanism is disposed in the fuel feed conduit between the inlet end and the outlet end operable to regulate flow through the fuel feed conduit. A position feedback sensor is operatively connected to the fuel metering mechanism and operable to generate a signal indicative of a position of the fuel metering mechanism.