Hydrogen Reduction of Iron Ore Concentrate in Moving Bed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The steelmaking industry faces challenges with high energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and costly processes due to the predominance of blast furnace technology, which requires energy-intensive sintering and pelletization steps, and generates significant CO2 emissions.

Innovation Solution

A hydrogen ironmaking process using a counter-current moving bed reactor with a loose bed of iron ore concentrate, where hydrogen flows over the concentrate at temperatures between 500-1000°C, eliminating the need for sintering and pelletization, and utilizing hydrogen or natural gas as reductants to reduce CO2 emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional blast furnace technology is used, then iron production is achieved, but energy consumption is high and CO2 emissions are significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron productionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the ironmaking process by using hydrogen as the reducing agent instead of coke, operating at lower temperatures (500-1000°C), and processing iron ore concentrate directly without sintering or pelletization. These parameter changes enable significant energy reduction while maintaining iron production capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the energy-intensive sintering and pelletization steps from the traditional ironmaking process. By using iron ore concentrate directly in a fluidized bed reactor, the process removes unnecessary preprocessing stages that consume large amounts of energy, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while preserving iron production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If traditional blast furnace technology is used, then iron production is achieved, but CO2 emissions are significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron productionVSAvoidCO2 emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful CO2-generating coke-based reduction process into a beneficial hydrogen-based reduction process. By using hydrogen as the reducing agent, the process eliminates CO2 emissions from the reduction step and produces water as the only byproduct, thereby converting a harmful traditional process into an environmentally beneficial one while maintaining iron production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical parameter of the reducing agent from carbon-based (coke) to hydrogen-based, fundamentally altering the emission profile of the ironmaking process. This parameter change eliminates CO2 emissions while preserving the core function of iron production from iron ore concentrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If sintering and pelletization are used to prepare iron ore, then iron production is achieved, but process cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron productionVSAvoidprocess cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the costly sintering and pelletization preprocessing steps from the ironmaking process. By directly feeding iron ore concentrate into the fluidized bed reactor, the process removes these expensive intermediate stages, thereby reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining iron production capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the ironmaking process into a simplified single-stage operation using iron ore concentrate, eliminating the need for separate sintering and pelletization facilities. This segmentation reduces capital investment and operating costs associated with multiple preprocessing plants while preserving iron production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Speed

If high temperature reduction is used to achieve fast reduction rate, then reduction speed is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a fluidized bed reactor where hydrogen gas flows through the iron ore concentrate, creating a fluidized state that enhances mass and heat transfer. This pneumatic approach enables fast reduction rates at lower temperatures by improving gas-solid contact efficiency, thereby achieving high reduction speed without excessive energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating temperature parameter from traditional high temperatures to a lower range (500-1000°C), combined with hydrogen as the reducing agent and fluidized bed operation. This parameter change achieves fast reduction rates through improved mass transfer while reducing the energy input required for heating, thereby decoupling reduction speed from high energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process reduces energy consumption by 30-50% and CO2 emissions by 60-95%, simplifies equipment design, and allows for the use of low-grade iron ores, promoting a hydrogen economy with environmental and energy benefits.

Implementation Method 1

hydrogen reduction of iron ore concentrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

a gas-solid reaction in a moving bed process using a stream of hydrogen as the reductant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas-solid reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

counter-current stream of hydrogen flowing thereover

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounter-current flow: Convection

Implementation Method 4

the reduction temperature will be such that interparticle diffusion will largely control the reduction rate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterparticle diffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 5

a gas-solid reaction in a moving bed process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoving bed process: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS12163198B2Hydrogen reduction of iron ore concentrate in loose layers and compacts
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 UNIV OF UTAH RES FOUND
  • US12163198B2 patent drawing
  • US12163198B2 patent drawing
  • US12163198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An alternative approach to producing iron from iron concentrates produced from low grade iron ore without going through pelletization and induration. Such a method may include providing iron ore concentrate in a small particle form, passing the iron ore concentrate through a moving bed conveyor reduction furnace with at least one of hydrogen or natural gas, wherein the concentrate is present in a layer that is no more than about 5 cm thick, the hydrogen gas or natural gas reducing the concentrate so as to remove oxygen therefrom, converting the iron ore concentrate to iron that has a composition similar to direct reduced iron (DRI) or sponge iron product, having about 90-95% iron, up to about 10% oxygen, with other trace impurities. Energy consumption is reduced by 30-50% and CO2 emissions are reduced by 60-95%, depending on whether natural gas or hydrogen is used.