Hydrogen liquefaction system and hydrogen liquefaction method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hydrogen liquefaction systems face inefficiencies in producing liquid hydrogen for long-term storage and long-distance transportation due to slow Ortho-Para (O-P) conversion processes, which require additional cooling and high energy consumption, and often skip O-P conversion for short-term storage to maintain efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A hydrogen liquefaction system with a bypass mode that optionally performs O-P conversion using a bypass device and an external heat exchange chamber to cool conversion heat, allowing for the production of liquid hydrogen in both normal and equilibrium states, enhancing conversion efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If O-P conversion is performed using a separate hydrogen liquefaction device, then liquid hydrogen in equilibrium condition is produced for long-term storage, but energy consumption increases and conversion efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid hydrogen stability for long-term storageVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The O-P conversion device is integrated into the existing hydrogen liquefaction device, merging two separate functions (liquefaction and O-P conversion) into a single system. This eliminates the need for a separate O-P conversion device, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining the ability to produce equilibrium liquid hydrogen for long-term storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrogen liquefaction device is designed to perform multiple functions: both liquefaction of gaseous hydrogen and O-P conversion of liquid hydrogen. The controller enables the device to switch between liquefaction mode and O-P conversion mode, making the system universal and adaptable to different storage requirements without requiring separate dedicated devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If O-P conversion is performed, then liquid hydrogen in equilibrium condition is produced, but additional cooling power is required due to heat generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid hydrogen stabilityVSAvoidcooling power
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The heat generated during O-P conversion, which was previously a harmful factor requiring additional cooling power, is converted into a beneficial resource. The controller utilizes this conversion heat to pre-cool gaseous hydrogen before it enters the liquefaction process, reducing the overall cooling power requirement and improving the efficiency of producing equilibrium liquid hydrogen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling function for O-P conversion heat is merged with the existing cooling cycle device used for hydrogen liquefaction. The heat exchanger integrates the O-P conversion heat removal process with the liquefaction cooling process, allowing the same cooling infrastructure to serve dual purposes and reducing additional cooling power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If a separate O-P conversion device is used, then equilibrium liquid hydrogen is produced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid hydrogen stability for long-term storageVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The O-P conversion device is merged with the hydrogen liquefaction device into a single integrated system. The controller coordinates both liquefaction and O-P conversion functions within one device, eliminating the need for separate standalone O-P conversion equipment and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrogen liquefaction device is designed as a universal system that can perform both liquefaction and O-P conversion functions. The controller enables flexible operation modes, allowing the device to adapt to different storage requirements (short-term vs. long-term) without requiring separate dedicated devices, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If gaseous hydrogen is directly liquefied without O-P conversion, then conversion efficiency is maintained for short-term storage, but liquid hydrogen stability decreases for long-term storage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquefaction efficiencyVSAvoidliquid hydrogen stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The O-P conversion is performed as a preliminary action before long-term storage, converting ortho-hydrogen to para-hydrogen to achieve equilibrium condition. The controller determines whether to perform O-P conversion based on the intended storage duration, ensuring that liquid hydrogen is pre-prepared in a stable equilibrium state for long-term storage while maintaining high liquefaction efficiency for short-term applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the production of liquid hydrogen in a normal state for short-term storage and in equilibrium condition for long-term storage or transportation, while increasing conversion efficiency by effectively managing O-P conversion heat, thus addressing the inefficiencies of conventional systems.

Implementation Method 1

heat exchange occurs in a heat exchange section leading to liquefaction of gaseous hydrogen into liquid hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

liquefaction of gaseous hydrogen into liquid hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquefaction: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

converting a ratio of ortho-hydrogen to para-hydrogen in a process of liquefying gaseous hydrogen into liquid hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectO-P conversion: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

cooling O-P conversion heat using an external heat exchange chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS20240318904A1Hydrogen liquefaction system and hydrogen liquefaction method
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 H2CREO CORP
  • US20240318904A1 patent drawing
  • US20240318904A1 patent drawing
  • US20240318904A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a hydrogen liquefaction system and hydrogen liquefaction method optionally enabling O-P conversion in a hydrogen liquefaction process, and may include: a hydrogen pipe, where gaseous hydrogen is introduced at a front end, heat exchange occurs in a heat exchange section leading to liquefaction of gaseous hydrogen into liquid hydrogen, and liquefied liquid hydrogen can be discharged at a rear end; a cooling cycle device that is in thermal contact with the heat exchange section of the hydrogen pipe so as to perform heat exchange with the heat exchange section of the hydrogen pipe such that gaseous hydrogen can be liquefied into liquid hydrogen; and an Ortho-Para (O-P) converter formed in the hydrogen pipe, converting a ratio of ortho-hydrogen to para-hydrogen in a process of liquefying gaseous hydrogen into liquid hydrogen.