Hydrogen Tank Filling Method Using Variable Flow Rates
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for filling hydrogen tanks in vehicles are inefficient in terms of time, as they do not allow for rapid filling without exceeding temperature limits, which can damage the tank, and existing methods do not effectively manage heat dissipation during the filling process.
Innovation Solution
A method involving a series of decreasing filling rates, starting with a high flow rate and gradually decreasing to minimize filling time while controlling heat dissipation, using a combination of on/off valves or variable-flow regulating valves to regulate the flow rate, and potentially incorporating cooling mechanisms to manage temperature.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If rapid pressurization is used to reduce filling time, then filling speed is improved, but gas temperature increases excessively causing potential tank damage
Solution Approach 1:
The filling process is divided into multiple sequential steps with different flow rates. The method uses at least two filling steps where the first step operates at a higher flow rate to rapidly fill the tank when the temperature rise is less critical, and the second step operates at a lower flow rate to control temperature during the final pressurization phase. This segmentation of the filling process allows optimization of both filling speed and temperature control.
Solution Approach 2:
The filling flow rate is made dynamic rather than constant. The method adjusts the flow rate during the filling process, transitioning from a higher initial flow rate to a lower final flow rate. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to exploit the thermal capacity of the tank during rapid filling while preventing excessive temperature rise as the tank approaches its final pressure, thereby resolving the contradiction between filling speed and temperature control.
2Loss of time
If high flow rate is maintained throughout filling, then filling time is reduced, but heat dissipation becomes insufficient leading to temperature limits being exceeded
Solution Approach 1:
The filling operation is segmented into phases with different thermal characteristics. The first phase uses high flow rate when the tank has sufficient thermal capacity to dissipate heat, and the second phase uses lower flow rate when the tank is more susceptible to temperature rise. This segmentation allows the system to maximize filling speed during phases where heat dissipation is adequate while preventing thermal damage when heat dissipation becomes insufficient.
Solution Approach 2:
The method performs preliminary rapid filling when the tank is cooler and has better heat dissipation capacity, before the temperature rise becomes problematic. By anticipating the thermal limitations and acting accordingly, the system maximizes the useful filling time while preventing the harmful effect of insufficient heat dissipation during critical phases.
3Temperature
If multiple filling steps with different flow rates are used, then temperature control is improved, but filling time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The method uses a high flow rate in the first filling step at excessive levels compared to what would be used for the entire process, deliberately allowing faster filling when thermal conditions permit. This partial excessive action is followed by a lower flow rate step to complete the filling, achieving optimal balance between temperature control and filling time by using high flow rate only when necessary and safe.
Solution Approach 2:
The filling parameters, specifically the flow rate, are changed during the process based on thermal considerations. The method transitions from a high flow rate parameter to a lower flow rate parameter as the filling progresses and thermal conditions change. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the system to maintain good temperature control while minimizing the penalty on filling time that would result from using a consistently low flow rate.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach allows for faster filling times, typically under 3-4 minutes, while maintaining the tank within safe temperature limits, thereby improving the efficiency and safety of the hydrogen refueling process.
Implementation Method 1
The gas heats up because, on the one hand, of the Joule-Thomson effect, i.e. heating caused by the pressure difference between the hydrogen source and the tank
Implementation Method 2
As regards the heating by compression of the gas, this is due to introduction of enthalpy into the tank via the supply gas: by being compressed, the gas inside the tank rises in temperature
Implementation Method 3
Simultaneously with this heating there is heat dissipation from the gas to the walls of its tank and then to the environment of the tank
Data Source
AI summary
A method for filling a gas tank at a pressure P2 from at least one gas source at a pressure Pi, P1 being higher than V2, said container and said at least one gas source being connected by a duct allowing the passage of gas from one to the other, the filing being carried out at a flow rate which is, at the end of the filling, lower than the initial flow rate, wherein said method comprises several successive filling steps 1 to i, each of the steps being carried out with a filling flow rate D1 to Di for a time t1 to ti, i being an integer higher than or equal to 2, the flow rate of a step i-1 being higher than the flow rate of the step i,; characterized in that the successive filling steps 1 to i are adapted for producing a controlled heating of the container that maximizes the heat dispersal in said container without increasing the temperature inside the container beyond the maximum accepted temperature for the container, and in that the sum of ti is between 1 and 7 minutes, preferably between 1 min 30 sec and 5 minutes, and more preferably between 2 and 4 minutes.


