Hydrogen Tank Refilling Algorithm Using Composite Heat Capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydrogen tank refueling methods are conservative, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs due to the need for safety margins, particularly in non-communication fueling operations, where unknown parameters result in longer fill times and lower final pressures, and lack of adjustment for varying operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

The MC Method employs a new tank filling model based on total heat capacity and an advanced algorithm that improves hydrogen filling station performance by using additional thermodynamic information, allowing for faster and more accurate filling across a range of conditions, including those outside traditional SAE TIR J2601 tables, and enables lower-cost stations to meet performance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conservative refueling procedures are used to ensure safety, then safety margins are improved, but fill time increases and final fill pressure decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety marginVSAvoidfill speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the refueling rate based on real-time temperature measurements from the tank. The controller continuously monitors tank temperature and modifies the dispensing rate accordingly, transitioning from static conservative rates to dynamic adaptive rates that optimize both safety and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where temperature sensors continuously monitor the tank temperature during refueling, and this information is fed back to the controller which adjusts the refueling rate. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond to actual thermal conditions rather than relying on conservative predetermined rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If conservative refueling procedures are used to ensure safety, then safety margins are improved, but energy efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety marginVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the refueling rate based on real-time temperature measurements from the tank. The controller continuously monitors tank temperature and modifies the dispensing rate accordingly, transitioning from static conservative rates to dynamic adaptive rates that optimize both safety and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where temperature sensors continuously monitor the tank temperature during refueling, and this information is fed back to the controller which adjusts the refueling rate. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond to actual thermal conditions rather than relying on conservative predetermined rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If pre-cooling temperature is increased to maintain safety specifications, then safety is improved, but station cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety specification complianceVSAvoidstation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the tank itself as the cooling mechanism by leveraging the endothermic expansion of hydrogen during dispensing. The expanding cold hydrogen naturally cools the tank during the refueling process, eliminating or reducing the need for external pre-cooling infrastructure and associated costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the cold effect of expanding hydrogen (which was previously considered a potential hazard requiring mitigation) into a beneficial cooling mechanism. The endothermic expansion that naturally occurs during dispensing is harnessed to cool the tank, turning a potential problem into a solution that reduces pre-cooling requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Use of energy by moving object

If pre-cooling temperature is decreased to reduce energy use, then energy efficiency is improved, but customer satisfaction decreases due to longer wait times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidrefueling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the refueling rate based on real-time temperature measurements from the tank. The controller continuously monitors tank temperature and modifies the dispensing rate accordingly, transitioning from static conservative rates to dynamic adaptive rates that optimize both safety and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where temperature sensors continuously monitor the tank temperature during refueling, and this information is fed back to the controller which adjusts the refueling rate. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond to actual thermal conditions rather than relying on conservative predetermined rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MC Method enhances fill speed and quality, allows for more efficient energy use, and maintains safety margins, enabling hydrogen filling stations to operate effectively under various conditions without the need for extensive pre-cooling or communication protocols.

Implementation Method 1

a hydrogen station or dispenser continuously calculates the mass average enthalpy of the hydrogen fill, with the mass average enthalpy estimated prior to the fill being conducted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule-Thomson effect: Joule-Thomson Effect

Implementation Method 2

the refueling of compressed hydrogen tanks are to be conducted in a manner that prevents the tank from overheating (temperatures exceeding 85° C.) during refueling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic compression: Adiabatic Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9347612B2Method and system for tank refilling using active fueling speed control
Publication Date: 2016.05.24 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9347612B2 patent drawing
  • US9347612B2 patent drawing
  • US9347612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is an improved analytical method that can be utilized by hydrogen filling stations for directly and accurately calculating the end-of-fill temperature in a hydrogen tank that, in turn, allows for improvements in the fill quantity while tending to reduce refueling time. The calculations involve calculation of a composite heat capacity value, MC, from a set of thermodynamic parameters drawn from both the tank system receiving the gas and the station supplying the gas. These thermodynamic parameters are utilized in a series of simple analytical equations to define a multi-step process by which target fill times, final temperatures and final pressures can be determined. The parameters can be communicated to the station directly from the vehicle or retrieved from a database accessible by the station. Because the method is based on direct measurements of actual thermodynamic conditions and quantified thermodynamic behavior, significantly improved tank filling results can be achieved.