Variable-Orifice Pressure Relief Valve for Hydrogen Blowdown Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pressure relief valves for hydrogen storage tanks face challenges in controlling mass flow rate and flame size, leading to potential hazards and inefficient tank blowdown times due to fixed orifice designs.

Innovation Solution

A pressure relief device with a piston mechanism that varies the outlet orifice size based on pressure differentials, using a spring-biased piston to adjust the orifice between end stops, allowing for dynamic control of fuel flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed orifice is used to control hydrogen flow, then flame size can be controlled, but tank blowdown time is lengthened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame controlVSAvoidblowdown time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a movable piston within a cylinder that can dynamically adjust the orifice size. The piston is biased by a spring and moves in response to pressure differentials, transitioning between a first position (restricting flow) and a second position (allowing rapid blowdown). This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by enabling both controlled flame size initially and rapid tank emptying as pressure drops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the flow resistance parameter dynamically through piston movement. At high pressure, the piston is in the first position providing restricted flow for controlled combustion. As pressure drops, the piston moves to the second position increasing the orifice size to maintain adequate mass flow rate and reduce blowdown time. This parameter change resolves the time-flame control contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a fixed orifice is used, then device complexity is reduced, but mass flow control capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorifice designVSAvoidmass flow control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dynamic piston-cylinder mechanism that automatically adjusts orifice size based on pressure differentials. The spring-biased piston moves between two positions, providing restricted flow at high pressure and open flow at low pressure. This dynamic adaptation enhances mass flow control capability while maintaining relatively simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure relief device is self-regulating through the spring-biased piston mechanism. The piston automatically responds to pressure differential changes without external control, transitioning between restricted and open flow states. This self-service capability provides adaptive mass flow control while avoiding complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the orifice is made larger to enable rapid blowdown, then tank emptying time is reduced, but flame size becomes hazardously large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblowdown rateVSAvoidflame hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a dynamic piston mechanism that adjusts orifice size based on real-time pressure conditions. Initially, the piston restricts flow to control flame size. As tank pressure drops and blowdown progresses, the piston automatically moves to a more open position, increasing the effective orifice size. This enables rapid final blowdown while maintaining safe flame dimensions throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure relief device operates in distinct phases: an initial restricted flow phase for controlled flame establishment, followed by a transition phase as pressure drops, and a final rapid blowdown phase. This periodic action pattern allows the system to achieve both flame control and rapid emptying by adapting flow resistance to the current blowdown stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid tank blowdown while maintaining a controlled flame size and mass flow rate, reducing the risk of hazardous accumulations and enhancing safety in hydrogen storage systems.

Implementation Method 1

a spring mounted between the second end of the piston and the end wall of the cylinder, the spring arranged to bias the second end of the piston towards the second end stop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

movement of the piston along a longitudinal axis of the cylinder between the first and second end stops varies a size of the outlet orifice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP4667794A1Pressure relief valve
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • EP4667794A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4667794A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4667794A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

This disclosure relates to a pressure relief valve for a gaseous fuel such as hydrogen. Example embodiments include a pressure relief device (100) for a gaseous fuel, the device (100) comprising: a cylinder (101) having a fuel inlet (102a, 102b) in a wall (103) of the cylinder (101), an outlet (104) at an open first end (105) of the cylinder (101) and an end wall (106) at a closed opposing second end (107) of the cylinder (101); a piston (108) disposed within the cylinder (101), the piston (108) having a first end (109) adjacent the outlet (104) of the cylinder (101) defining an outlet orifice (110) and a second opposing end (111) slidably mounted within the cylinder (101) between first and second end stops (112a, 112b); and a spring (113) mounted between the second end (111) of the piston (108) and the end wall (106) of the cylinder (101), the spring (113) arranged to bias the second end (111) of the piston (108) towards the second end stop (112b), wherein movement of the piston (108) along a longitudinal axis (114) of the cylinder (101) between the first and second end stops (112a, 112b) varies a size of the outlet orifice (110) to thereby vary a flow of gaseous fuel between the fuel inlet (102a, 102b) and the outlet orifice (110)